Cited by 127Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and the contribution of unknown precursors and short-chain (C2–C3) perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids at solid waste disposal facilities

Wang, Bin, Yao, Yiming, Chen, Hao, Chang, Shuai, Tian, Ying, Sun, Hongwen·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

The emission of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) from municipal solid wastes (MSW) disposal raises concerns for their potential of long-term release and risks. In this study, the occurrence of PFASs was investigated in ambient air and leachate from seven MSW disposal facilities including three landfills, two incineration plants, and two MSW transfer stations in Tianjin, China. Mass loads of PFASs (≥C4) released to the atmosphere were estimated at 0.007-0.97 kg/y/site, which were much lower than those to leachate (0.04-1.3 kg/y/site), while emission to the atmosphere at landfills was more considerable. With total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay, unknown C4-C12 perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs)-precursors were found contributing 10-97 mol% in leachate and accounting for additional 15%-43% mass loads. Using IC-Ba/Ag/H cartridges, trifluoroacetic acid (C2) and perfluoropropionic acid (C3) were recovered in leachate for TOP assay (62%-78%) and determined at dominant levels of 19-81 μg/L, which accounted for mass loads of 0.08-2.6 kg/y/site. Unknown C2-C3 PFAA-precursors contributed 12-93 mol% with mass loads of 0.10-3.0 kg/y/site. Overall, unknown C2-C12 PFAA-precursors remained contributing 0.35-68 mol% in biochemically treated leachate. This study emphasizes that the profiles of unknown PFAA-precursors released during MSW disposal are to be identified, which is essential for their environmental risk assessment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135832

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surface waters could be exposed to NEPs and POPs via several sources including WWTPs, landfills, atmospheric deposition, and industrial or agricultural activities.

    “Surface waters typically run along rural or urban areas and could be exposed to NEPs and POPs (also referred to as pollutants across the text) via several sources. These include WWTPs (Biswas et al., 2022; Kur­ wadkar et al., 2022), landfills (Wang et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2023), atmospheric deposition (Pfotenhauer et al., 2022), and industrial or agricultural activities (Chirikona et”
  • A study of leachates and effluents from municipal waste disposal sites and landfills near Tianjin showed the presence of many PFAS as well as TFA at all sampling sites.

    “A study of leachates and effluents from municipal waste disposal sites and landfills in the environs of Tianjin (China), the location of several fluorochemical manufacturing facilities, showed the presence of many PFAS as well as TFA at all sampling sites [233].”
  • Greatest amounts of TFA (60,000 and 50,000 ng a.e. L−1) were measured in leachates from two incineration plants, although leachates from one landfill and one transfer-site had similarly high concentrations approaching 40,000 ng a.e. L−1.

    “Greatest amounts of TFA (60,000 and 50,000 ng a.e. L−1) were measured in leachates from two incineration plants, although leachates from one landfill and one transfer-site had similarly high concentrations approaching 40,000 ng a.e. L−1.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, B., Yao, Y., Chen, H., Chang, S., Tian, Y., & Sun, H.
Affiliations
Nankai University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yao, Yiming
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
705
Pages
135832
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990792227
Cited by
127
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41573097, 41603101, 41807356)
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (T2017002)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City (18JCQNJC09200)
  • Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS emissions, municipal solid waste disposal, landfill leachate, incineration, transfer stations, total oxidizable precursor assay, trifluoroacetic acid, atmospheric emissions, environmental risk assessment
MeSH terms
Carboxylic Acids, China, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Refuse Disposal, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Solid Waste, Waste Disposal Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review