Cited by 4,519Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

Identifying Small Molecules via High Resolution Mass Spectrometry: Communicating Confidence

Open access
Schymanski, Emma L., Jeon, Junho, Gulde, Rebekka, Fenner, Kathrin, Ruff, Matthias, Singer, Heinz P., Hollender, Juliane·2014·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

T he increased availability of high resolution mass spectrom- etry (HR-MS) in chemical analysis has dramatically improved the detection and identification of compounds in environmental (and other) samples.This has opened up new research opportunities in environmental sciences, demonstrated by over 200 research papers per year, increasing strongly (source: SCOPUS keywords "high resolution mass spectromet", subject "envi").The elucidation of small molecules such as emerging pollutants and their transformation products using HR-MSbased suspect and nontarget analysis is gaining in relevance, also in other fields (e.g., metabolomics, drug discovery, forensics).However, confidence in these HR-MS-based identifications varies between studies and substances, since it is not always possible or even meaningful to synthesize each substance or confirm them via complementary methods (e.g., nuclear magnetic resonance).These varying levels of confidence are very difficult to communicate to readers concisely and accurately.In Figure 1 we propose a level system, which arose from intense discussions within our department, to ease the communication of identification confidence and form the basis of further discussions on this topic.This level system is not intended to replace guidance documents (e.g., EU Guideline 2002/657/EG), but specifically covers the new possibilities in HR-MS-based analysis.Our discussion started with the levels published by the Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI), 1 as we experienced many cases that fitted "in between" their proposed levels.While Jeon et al. 2 first refined these levels, these were tailored to the specific investigation.The levels in Figure 1 reconcile differences in the two proposals, contain additional levels pertinent to screening methods and are clarified in the text below.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es5002105

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schymanski, E. L., Jeon, J., Gulde, R., Fenner, K., Ruff, M., Singer, H. P., & Hollender, J.
Affiliations
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Schymanski, Emma L.
  • Hollender, Juliane
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2014-02-18
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
2097-2098
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2322580831
Cited by
4,519
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 883 · 2025: 770 · 2024: 604 · 2023: 525 · 2022: 461 · 2021: 397 · 2020: 299 · 2019: 208 · 2018: 168 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eidgenössische Anstalt für Wasserversorgung Abwasserreinigung und Gewässerschutz
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
identification confidence, high-resolution mass spectrometry, suspect screening, non-targeted analysis, small molecule identification, emerging contaminants, degradation intermediates, environmental analysis, screening method
MeSH terms
Communication, Environmental Pollutants, Molecular Weight, Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review