Cited by 228Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchChemical Analysis and Environmental ImpactFluoride Effects and Removal

Spatial Trends of Anionic, Zwitterionic, and Cationic PFASs at an AFFF-Impacted Site

Nickerson, Anastasia, Rodowa, Alix E., Adamson, David T., Field, Jennifer A., Kulkarni, Poonam R., Kornuc, John J., Higgins, Christopher P.·2021·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

= 58 for groundwater) and analyzed for an extensive list of anionic, zwitterionic, and cationic poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Spatial trends for perfluoroalkyl acids and many precursors enabled a better understanding of PFAS composition, transport, and transformation. All PFASs without analytical standards were semi-quantified. Summed PFAS and individual PFAS concentrations were often higher at depth than near the surface in soil and groundwater. Zwitterionic and cationic compounds composed a majority of the total PFAS mass (up to 97%) in firefighter training area (FTA) soil. Composition of PFAS class, chain length, and structural isomers changed with depth and distance from the FTA, suggesting in situ transformation and differential transport. The percentage of branched perfluorooctane sulfonate increased with depth, consistent with differential isomeric transport. However, linear perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) was enriched, suggesting fluorotelomer precursor transformation to linear PFOA. Perfluorohexane sulfonamide, a potential transformation product of sulfonamide-based PFASs, was present at high concentrations (maximum 448 ng/g in soil, 3.4 mg/L in groundwater). Precursor compounds may create long-term sources of perfluoroalkyl acids, although many pathways remain unknown; precursor analysis is critical for PFAS fate and transport understanding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.0c04473

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nickerson, A., Rodowa, A. E., Adamson, D. T., Field, J. A., Kulkarni, P. R., Kornuc, J. J., & Higgins, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Colorado School of Mines (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • GSI Environmental (United States) (US)
  • Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (US)
Corresponding author
Higgins, Christopher P.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2020-12-22
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
313-323
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W3113753001
Cited by
228
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 1
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Defense (ER-201633, ER-2720)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS precursors, aqueous film-forming foam, soil contamination, groundwater contamination, perfluorooctanoic acid, in situ transformation, depth profiles, spatial distribution
MeSH terms
Fluorocarbons, Soil, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Groundwater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review