Cited by 329Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluoride Effects and RemovalWater Treatment and Disinfection

Worldwide drinking water occurrence and levels of newly-identified perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances

Kaboré, Hermann A., Vo Duy, Sung, Munoz, Gabriel, Méité, Ladji, Desrosiers, Mélanie, Liu, Jinxia, Sory, Traoré Karim, Sauvé, Sébastien·2018·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

In the last decade or so, concerns have arisen with respect to the widespread occurrence of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in the environment, food, drinking water, and humans. In this study, the occurrence and levels of a large range of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) were investigated in drinking water (bottled and tap water samples) from various locations around the world. Automated off-line solid phase extraction followed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry was used to analyze PFASs of various chain lengths and functional groups. In total, 29 target and 104 suspect-target PFASs were screened in drinking water samples (n=97) from Canada and other countries (Burkina Faso, Chile, Ivory Coast, France, Japan, Mexico, Norway, and the USA) in 2015-2016. Out of the 29 PFASs quantitatively analyzed, perfluorocarboxylates (PFCAs: C 4/14), perfluoroalkane sulfonates (PFSAs: C 4, C 6, C 8), and perfluoroalkyl acid precursors (e.g., 5:3 fluorotelomer carboxylate (5:3 FTCA)) were recurrently detected in drinking water samples (concentration range: <LOD to 39ngL-1). Tap water samples from Canada showed noteworthy differences depending on their source; for instance, ∑29 PFASwas significantly greater in those produced from the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence River ecosystem than those produced from other types of sources (14 versus 5.3ngL-1, respectively). A suspect-target screening approach indicated that other perfluoroalkane sulfonamides (FBSA, FHxSA), perfluoroethyl cyclohexane sulfonate (PFECHS), ultrashort chain (C 2-C 3) PFSAs (PFEtS, PFPrS), and two additional PFSAs (PFPeS (C 5) and PFHpS (C 7)) were repeatedly present in tap water samples (concentration ranges: <LOD to 4.0ngL-1). To the authors' best knowledge, this constitutes the first observation of a cyclic perfluoroalkane sulfonate (PFECHS) and C 4-C 6 perfluoroalkane sulfonamides (FBSA, FHxSA) in drinking water. According to the newly updated US EPA health advisory for PFOS and PFOA (70ngL-1), the drinking water samples collected in the present monitoring would not pose a health risk to consumers as regards PFAA levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.210

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analysis of drinking water samples from the United States, Canada, Burkina Faso, Chile, Ivory Coast, France, Japan, Mexico, and Norway found PFCAs, PFSAs, and perfluoroalkyl acid precursors frequently detected at concentrations from below detection limits to 39 ng/L.

    “Analysis of drinking water samples collected from the United States, Canada, Burkina Faso, Chile, Ivory Coast, France, Japan, Mexico, and Norway indicate that three PFAS (PFCAs, PFSAs, and perfluoroalkyl acid precursors) were frequently detected with concentrations ranging from below detection limits to 39 ng L−1 (Kaboré et al., 2018).”
  • The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the USA reported trace levels of PFAS in 98% of human serum samples collected between 2003 and 2004.

    “The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted in the USA, reported trace levels of PFAS in 98% of the human serum samples collected between 2003 and 2004 (Calafat et al., 2007; Kaboré et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaboré, H. A., Vo Duy, S., Munoz, G., Méité, L., Desrosiers, M., Liu, J., Sory, T. K., & Sauvé, S.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs (CA)
  • Université Nangui Abrogoua (CI)
Corresponding author
Sauvé, Sébastien
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
616-617
Pages
1089-1100
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765352572
Cited by
329
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2015-05729)
  • Fonds de Recherche Nature et Technologies du Québec (2015-PR-183278)
  • Canadian Foundation for Innovation (31090)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
Keywords
tap water, bottled water, perfluorocarboxylates, Great Lakes, St. Lawrence River
MeSH terms
Alkanesulfonates, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Pollution, Chemical, Water Supply, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review