The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Mineral Additives on Biochar Formation: Carbon Retention, Stability, and Properties
Abstract
Biochar is being recognized as a promising tool for long-term carbon sequestration, and biochar with high carbon retention and strong stability is supposed to be explored for that purpose. In this study, three minerals, including kaolin, calcite (CaCO3), and calcium dihydrogen phosphate [Ca(H2PO4)2], were added to rice straw feedstock at the ratio of 20% (w/w) for biochar formation through pyrolysis treatment, aiming to improve carbon retention and stabilization in biochar. Kaolin and CaCO3 had little effect on the carbon retention, whereas Ca(H2PO4)2 increased the carbon retention by up to 29% compared to untreated biochar. Although the carbon loss from the kaolin-modified biochar with hydrogen peroxide oxidation was enhanced, CaCO3 and Ca(H2PO4)2 modification reduced the carbon loss by 18.6 and 58.5%, respectively. Moreover, all three minerals reduced carbon loss of biochar with potassium dichromate oxidation from 0.3 to 38.8%. The microbial mineralization as CO2 emission in all three modified biochars was reduced by 22.2-88.7% under aerobic incubation and 5-61% under anaerobic incubation. Enhanced carbon retention and stability of biochar with mineral treatment might be caused by the enhanced formation of aromatic C, which was evidenced by cross-polarization magic angle spinning (13)C nuclear magnetic resonance spectra and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis. Our results indicated that the three minerals, especially Ca(H2PO4)2, were effective in increasing carbon retention and strengthening biochar stabilization, which provided a novel idea that people could explore and produce the designated biochar with high carbon sequestration capacity and stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review
Mohan, D., Pittman, C. U., & Steele, P. H. (2006) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef0502397 · Cited by 5,663
Biochar effects on soil biota – A review
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 · Cited by 5,074
Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W. (2002) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4 · Cited by 2,890
Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar)
Zimmerman, A. R. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903140c · Cited by 1,103
Influence of inorganic salts on the primary pyrolysis products of cellulose
Patwardhan, P. R., Satrio, J. A., Brown, R. C., & Shanks, B. H. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.112 · Cited by 799
Mechanisms of biochar decreasing methane emission from Chinese paddy soils
Feng, Y., Xu, Y., Yu, Y., Xie, Z., & Lin, X. (2012) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.11.016 · Cited by 460
Fuertes, A. B., Arbestain, M. C., Sevilla, M., Maciá-Agulló, J. A., Fiol, S., López, R., Smernik, R. J., Aitkenhead, W. P., Arce, F., & Macias, F. (2010) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr10010 · Cited by 430
Reducing CH4 and CO2 emissions from waterlogged paddy soil with biochar
Liu, Y., Yang, M., Wu, Y., Wang, H., Chen, Y., & Wu, W. (2011) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-011-0376-x · Cited by 393
Contribution to characterisation of biochar to estimate the labile fraction of carbon
Calvelo Pereira, R., Kaal, J., Camps Arbestain, M., Pardo Lorenzo, R., Aitkenhead, W., Hedley, M., Macías, F., Hindmarsh, J., & Maciá-Agulló, J. A. (2011) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.09.002 · Cited by 271
Predicting C aromaticity of biochars based on their elemental composition
Wang, T., Camps-Arbestain, M., & Hedley, M. (2013) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2013.06.012 · Cited by 78
Cited by
Rajapaksha, A. U., Chen, S. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Zhang, M., Vithanage, M., Mandal, S., Gao, B., Bolan, N. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2016) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.043 · Cited by 1,322
Zhu, X., Chen, B., Zhu, L., & Xing, B. (2017) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.032 · Cited by 1,021
Xiao, X., Chen, B., Chen, Z., Zhu, L., & Schnoor, J. L. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b06487 · Cited by 914
Fang, G., Liu, C., Gao, J., Dionysiou, D. D., & Zhou, D. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es5061512 · Cited by 887
An overview of the effect of pyrolysis process parameters on biochar stability
Leng, L., & Huang, H. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.030 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, F., Cao, X., Zhao, L., Wang, J., & Ding, Z.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-09-24
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 11211-11217
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2325767237
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
