Cited by 527Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactMunicipal Solid Waste Management

Global Emissions of Trace Gases, Particulate Matter, and Hazardous Air Pollutants from Open Burning of Domestic Waste

Wiedinmyer, Christine, Yokelson, Robert J., Gullett, Brian K.·2014·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The open burning of waste, whether at individual residences, businesses, or dump sites, is a large source of air pollutants. These emissions, however, are not included in many current emission inventories used for chemistry and climate modeling applications. This paper presents the first comprehensive and consistent estimates of the global emissions of greenhouse gases, particulate matter, reactive trace gases, and toxic compounds from open waste burning. Global emissions of CO2 from open waste burning are relatively small compared to total anthropogenic CO2; however, regional CO2 emissions, particularly in many developing countries in Asia and Africa, are substantial. Further, emissions of reactive trace gases and particulate matter from open waste burning are more significant on regional scales. For example, the emissions of PM10 from open domestic waste burning in China is equivalent to 22% of China's total reported anthropogenic PM10 emissions. The results of the emissions model presented here suggest that emissions of many air pollutants are significantly underestimated in current inventories because open waste burning is not included, consistent with studies that compare model results with available observations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es502250z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiedinmyer, C., Yokelson, R. J., & Gullett, B. K.
Affiliations
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • University of Montana (US)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
Corresponding author
Wiedinmyer, Christine
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2014-07-28
Volume
48
Issue
16
Pages
9523-9530
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2321241648
Cited by
527
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
open waste burning, household waste, greenhouse gas emissions, particulate matter, reactive trace gases, hazardous air pollutants, emission inventory, CO2 emissions, PM10, developing countries, China, Asia, Africa, emission modeling
MeSH terms
Africa, Air Pollutants, Asia, Carbon Dioxide, China, Developing Countries, Gases, Models, Theoretical, Incineration, Waste Management, Particulate Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review