Cited by 41Fluid Dynamics and MixingHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaGranular flow and fluidized beds

Heat Transfer in a Slurry Bubble Column Reactor: A Critical Overview

Jhawar, A. K., Prakash, A.·2012·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

Studies of heat transfer in slurry bubble column reactors have been reviewed and observed differences analyzed based on available data. Heat transfer in these reactors is a strong function of some parameters and a weak function of others. The parameters significantly influencing heat transfer in these reactors are the superficial gas velocity, thermophysical properties of liquid and solid particles, and size and concentration of the particles. Moreover, the rate of change with a parameter is dependent on the operating flow regime, particle properties, and presence of internals. Of all of the parameters, the effect of the particles is more complex and inadequately understood because particles influence the flow regime transition and thermophysical and rheological properties of the suspension, which, in turn, affect the hydrodynamic behavior and associated heat-transfer characteristics. The effects of the column diameter and internals have been investigated by a limited number of studies. A comparison of available data shows that the effect of the column diameter on heat transfer diminishes above 0.3 m. This, however, requires confirmation from larger-diameter studies together with associated hydrodynamic studies and appropriate modeling. Literature correlations for the heat-transfer coefficient have been reviewed and their limitations and applicability discussed. Axial and radial variations of heat-transfer coefficients reported in literature studies require appropriate design considerations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie201108b

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jhawar, A. K., & Prakash, A.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Prakash, A.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
1464-1473
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2324063831
Cited by
41
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
Keywords
slurry bubble column reactor, heat transfer, heat transfer correlations, superficial gas velocity, particle size and concentration, thermophysical properties, flow regime transition, column diameter effect, internal, suspension rheology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review