Cited by 239Algal biology and biofuel productionFluid Dynamics and MixingMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Photobioreactor Design for Commercial Biofuel Production from Microalgae

Kunjapur, Aditya M., Eldridge, R. Bruce·2010·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

This review paper describes systems used to cultivate microalgae for biofuel production. It addresses general design considerations pertaining to reactors that use natural light and photosynthetic growth mechanisms, with an emphasis on large-scale reactors. Important design aspects include lighting, mixing, water consumption, CO 2 consumption, O 2 removal, nutrient supply, temperature, and pH. Though open pond reactors are the most affordable option, they provide insufficient control of nearly all growth conditions. In contrast, a variety of closed reactors offer substantial control, but few feature the likelihood for levels of productivity that offset their high cost. One of the greatest challenges of closed photobioreactor design is how to increase reactor size in order to benefit from economy of scale and produce meaningful quantities of biofuel. This paper also highlights the concept of combining open and closed systems and concludes with a discussion regarding a possible optimal reactor configuration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie901459u

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expensive production costs hinder the ability to exploit economies of scale by increasing the reactor size to produce greater amounts of biodiesel.

    “Such expensive production costs hinder the ability to exploit economies of scale by increasing the reactor size to produce greater amounts of biodiesel (Kunjapur and Eldridge, 2010).”

    From Strategies to Produce Cost-Effective Third-Generation Biofuel From Microalgae (2021) · cites this paper as Kunjapur and Eldridge, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunjapur, A. M., & Eldridge, R. B.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Kunjapur, Aditya M.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2010-03-23
Volume
49
Issue
8
Pages
3516-3526
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2013720377
Cited by
239
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
photobioreactor design, microalgae cultivation, biofuel production, closed photobioreactors, daylighting, mixing, CO2 consumption, oxygen removal, nutrient supply, economies of scale, reactor configuration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review