The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Electrolyte Composition on Liquid-Gated Carbon Nanotube and Graphene Transistors
Abstract
Field-effect transistors based on single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and graphene can function as highly sensitive nanoscale (bio)sensors in solution. Here, we compare experimentally how SWNT and graphene transistors respond to changes in the composition of the aqueous electrolyte in which they are immersed. We show that the conductance of SWNTs and graphene is strongly affected by changes in the ionic strength, the pH, and the type of ions present, in a manner that can be qualitatively different for graphene and SWNT devices. We show that this sensitivity to electrolyte composition results from a combination of different mechanisms including electrostatic gating, Schottky-barrier modifications, and changes in gate capacitance. Interestingly, we find strong evidence that the sensor response to changes in electrolyte composition is affected by a high density of ionizable groups on both the underlying substrate and the carbon surfaces. We present a model based on the (regulated) surface charge associated with these ionizable groups that explains the majority of our data. Our findings have significant implications for interpreting and optimizing sensing experiments with nanocarbon transistors. This is particularly true for complex biological samples such as cell extracts, growth media, or bodily fluids, for which the complete composition of the solution needs to be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Importance of the Debye Screening Length on Nanowire Field Effect Transistor Sensors
Stern, E., Wagner, R., Sigworth, F. J., Breaker, R., Fahmy, T. M., & Reed, M. A. (2007) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl071792z · Cited by 806
Cited by
A Review of Organic and Inorganic Biomaterials for Neural Interfaces
Fattahi, P., Yang, G., Kim, G., & Abidian, M. R. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201304496 · Cited by 580
Xu, S., Zhan, J., Man, B., Jiang, S., Yue, W., Gao, S., Guo, C., Liu, H., Li, Z., Wang, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14902 · Cited by 437
Electrolyte-gated transistors for enhanced performance bioelectronics
Torricelli, F., Adrahtas, D. Z., Bao, Z., Berggren, M., Biscarini, F., Bonfiglio, A., Bortolotti, C. A., Frisbie, C. D., Macchia, E., Malliaras, G. G., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00065-8 · Cited by 422
Sensing at the Surface of Graphene Field‐Effect Transistors
Fu, W., Jiang, L., van Geest, E. P., Lima, L. M. C., & Schneider, G. F. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201603610 · Cited by 364
Flexible FET-Type VEGF Aptasensor Based on Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Converted from Conducting Polymer
Kwon, O. S., Park, S. J., Hong, J.-Y., Han, A.-R., Lee, J. S., Lee, J. S., Oh, J. H., & Jang, J. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn204395n · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Heller, I., Chatoor, S., Männik, J., Zevenbergen, M. A. G., Dekker, C., & Lemay, S. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-11-15
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 17149-17156
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2041174476
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Electrolyte Composition on Liquid-Gated Carbon Nanotube and Graphene Transistors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja104850n
- The paper
- Heller, I., Chatoor, S., Männik, J., Zevenbergen, M. A. G., Dekker, C., & Lemay, S. G. (2010). Influence of Electrolyte Composition on Liquid-Gated Carbon Nanotube and Graphene Transistors. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja104850n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.