Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 724

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polyelectrolyte Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes as Efficient Metal-free Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction

Wang, Shuangyin, Yu, Dingshan, Dai, Liming·2011·Journal of the American Chemical Society
DOI 10.1021/ja1112904
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Having a strong electron-withdrawing ability, poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA) was used to create net positive charge for carbon atoms in the nanotube carbon plane via intermolecular charge transfer. The resultant PDDA functionalized/adsorbed carbon nanotubes (CNTs), either in an aligned or nonaligned form, were demonstrated to act as metal-free catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in fuel cells with similar performance as Pt catalysts. The adsorption-induced intermolecular charge-transfer should provide a general approach to various carbon-based efficient metal-free ORR catalysts for oxygen reduction in fuel cells, and even new catalytic materials for applications beyond fuel cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja1112904

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Wang S. Y., 2009, J. Phys. Chem. C, 113, 18935, 10.1021/jp906923z · DOI · Paper page
  2. Yano H., 2008, J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 8372, 10.1021/jp712025q · DOI
  3. Kowal A., 2009, Nat. Mater., 8, 325, 10.1038/nmat2359 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Xiao L., 2009, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 602, 10.1021/ja8063765 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Liu R. L., 2010, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 49, 2565, 10.1002/anie.200907289 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Yu D. S., 2010, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 1, 2165, 10.1021/jz100533t · DOI · Paper page
  7. Xiong W., 2010, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 15127, 10.1021/ja105617z · DOI · Paper page
  8. Yu D., 2010, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 15839, 10.1021/ja104425h · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gong K. P., 2009, Science, 323, 760, 10.1126/science.1168049 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Alexeyeva N., 2008, Anal. Chim. Acta, 618, 140, 10.1016/j.aca.2008.04.056 · DOI
  11. Zhang M. N., 2004, Langmuir, 20, 8781, 10.1021/la048923l · DOI · Paper page
  12. Yang D. Q., 2005, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109, 4481, 10.1021/jp044511+ · doi:10.1021/jp044511+
  13. Chen W., 2008, Chem. Commun., 163, 10.1039/B715079B · DOI
  14. Collins P. G., 2000, Science, 287, 1801, 10.1126/science.287.5459.1801 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Choudhury D., 2010, Chem. Phys. Lett., 497, 66, 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.07.089 · DOI
  16. Rao A. M., 1997, Nature, 388, 257, 10.1038/40827 · doi:10.1038/40827
  17. Qu L. T., 2010, ACS Nano, 4, 1321, 10.1021/nn901850u · DOI · Paper page
  18. Shim M., 2001, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 11512, 10.1021/ja0169670 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., Yu, D., & Dai, L.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2011-03-17
Volume
133
Issue
14
Pages
5182-5185
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
DOI
10.1021/ja1112904
OpenAlex
W2002634552
Cited by
724
References
3
FWCI
28.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.