The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Noncanonical Self-Assembly of Multifunctional DNA Nanoflowers for Biomedical Applications
Open accessAbstract
DNA nanotechnology has been extensively explored to assemble various functional nanostructures for versatile applications. Mediated by Watson-Crick base-pairing, these DNA nanostructures have been conventionally assembled through hybridization of many short DNA building blocks. Here we report the noncanonical self-assembly of multifunctional DNA nanostructures, termed as nanoflowers (NFs), and the versatile biomedical applications. These NFs were assembled from long DNA building blocks generated via rolling circle replication (RCR) of a designer template. NF assembly was driven by liquid crystallization and dense packaging of building blocks, without relying on Watson-Crick base-pairing between DNA strands, thereby avoiding the otherwise conventional complicated DNA sequence design. NF sizes were readily tunable in a wide range, by simply adjusting such parameters as assembly time and template sequences. NFs were exceptionally resistant to nuclease degradation, denaturation, or dissociation at extremely low concentration, presumably resulting from the dense DNA packaging in NFs. The exceptional biostability is critical for biomedical applications. By rational design, NFs can be readily incorporated with myriad functional moieties. All these properties make NFs promising for versatile applications. As a proof-of-principle demonstration, in this study, NFs were integrated with aptamers, bioimaging agents, and drug loading sites, and the resultant multifunctional NFs were demonstrated for selective cancer cell recognition, bioimaging, and targeted anticancer drug delivery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy
Peer, D., Karp, J. M., Hong, S., Farokhzad, O. C., Margalit, R., & Langer, R. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.387 · Cited by 8,710
Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications
Petros, R. A., & DeSimone, J. M. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2591 · Cited by 3,651
Keefe, A. D., Pai, S., & Ellington, A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3141 · Cited by 2,289
The Sequence of the Human Genome
Venter, J. C., Smith, H. O., & Adams, M. D. (2015) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2014.237016 · Cited by 1,648
Aptamers evolved from live cells as effective molecular probes for cancer study
Shangguan, D., Li, Y., Tang, Z., Cao, Z. C., Chen, H. W., Mallikaratchy, P., Sefah, K., Yang, C. J., & Tan, W. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0602615103 · Cited by 1,516
Self-citationHuman Genome Sequencing Using Unchained Base Reads on Self-Assembling DNA Nanoarrays
Drmanac, R., Sparks, A. B., Callow, M. J., Halpern, A. L., Burns, N. L., Kermani, B. G., Carnevali, P., Nazarenko, I., Nilsen, G. B., Yeung, G., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181498 · Cited by 1,212
Shalon, D., Smith, S. J., & Brown, P. O. (1996) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6.7.639 · Cited by 1,115
Seeman, N. C. (2010) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060308-102244 · Cited by 992
Bath, J., & Turberfield, A. J. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.104 · Cited by 967
Cited by
Aptamer-integrated DNA nanostructures for biosensing, bioimaging and cancer therapy
Meng, H.-M., Liu, H., Kuai, H., Peng, R., Mo, L., & Zhang, X.-B. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00645g · Cited by 608
Self-citationAptamer-based targeted therapy
Zhu, G., & Chen, X. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.08.005 · Cited by 522
Self-citationSupramolecular cancer nanotheranostics
Zhou, J., Rao, L., Yu, G., Cook, T. R., Chen, X., & Huang, F. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00011f · Cited by 411
Precise nanomedicine for intelligent therapy of cancer
Chen, H., Gu, Z., An, H., Chen, C., Chen, J., Cui, R., Chen, S., Chen, W., Chen, X., Chen, X., et al. (2018) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-018-9397-5 · Cited by 409
Self-citationDNA Nanoflowers for Multiplexed Cellular Imaging and Traceable Targeted Drug Delivery
Hu, R., Zhang, X., Zhao, Z., Zhu, G., Chen, T., Fu, T., & Tan, W. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201400323 · Cited by 337
Self-citationCocoon-Like Self-Degradable DNA Nanoclew for Anticancer Drug Delivery
Sun, W., Jiang, T., Lu, Y., Reiff, M., Mo, R., & Gu, Z. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja5088024 · Cited by 329
Ouyang, Q., Liu, K., Zhu, Q., Deng, H., Le, Y., Ouyang, W., Yan, X., Zhou, W., & Tong, J. (2022) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202107534 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, G., Hu, R., Zhao, Z., Chen, Z., Zhang, X., & Tan, W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-10-28
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 16438-16445
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2157337481
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
