The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designed Two-Dimensional DNA Holliday Junction Arrays Visualized by Atomic Force Microscopy
Abstract
A two-dimensional DNA crystal has been designed and constructed from Holliday junction analogues that contain two helical domains twisted relative to each other. The Holliday junction is not an inherently rigid system, but it can be made less flexible if it is combined into a larger construct. We have fused four junctions into a rhombus-like molecule consisting of four six-turn helices, two on an upper layer and two on a lower layer; the branch points, which define vertices, are separated by four double helical turns each. Ligation of the rhombus-like motifs produces no cyclic species, when assayed by ligation-closure experiments. Self-assembly of the rhombuses in one dimension leads to a linear pattern. The rhombuses can be directed to self-assemble by hydrogen bonding into a two-dimensional periodic array, whose spacing is six turns in each direction. The expected spacing is seen when the array is observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Variation of the dimensions of the repeat unit from six turns × six turns to six turns × eight turns results in the expected increase in unit cell dimensions. Hence, it is possible to assemble periodic arrays with tunable cavities using these components. This system also provides the opportunity to measure directly the angles or torsion angles between the arms of branched junctions; here we measure the torsion angle between the helical domains of the Holliday junction analogue. We find by AFM that the torsion angle between helices is 63.5°, in good agreement with previous estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals
Winfree, E., Liu, F., Wenzler, L. A., & Seeman, N. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28998 · Cited by 2,857
Self-citation
Cited by
Programmable materials and the nature of the DNA bond
Jones, M. R., Seeman, N. C., & Mirkin, C. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1260901 · Cited by 1,347
Self-citationSeeman, N. C. (2010) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060308-102244 · Cited by 992
Self-citationLogical computation using algorithmic self-assembly of DNA triple-crossover molecules
Mao, C., LaBean, T. H., Reif, J. H., & Seeman, N. C. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35035038 · Cited by 779
Self-citationSmart Drug Delivery Nanocarriers with Self‐Assembled DNA Nanostructures
Li, J., Fan, C., Pei, H., Shi, J., & Huang, Q. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201300875 · Cited by 441
Metzger, R. M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500459d · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Mao, C., Sun, W., & Seeman, N. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-05-26
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 5437-5443
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2071836755
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.