Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced Cuprophilic Interactions in Crystalline Catalysts Facilitate the Highly Selective Electroreduction of CO2to CH4

Zhang, Lei, Li, Xiao-Xin, Lang, Zhong-Ling, Liu, Yang, Liu, Jiang, Yuan, Lin, Lu, Wan-Yue, Xia, Yuan-Sheng, Dong, Long-Zhang, Yuan, Da-Qiang, Lan, Ya-Qian·2021·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Cu(I)-based catalysts have proven to play an important role in the formation of specific hydrocarbon products from electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO 2 RR). However, it is difficult to understand the effect of intrinsic cuprophilic interactions inside the Cu(I) catalysts on the electrocatalytic mechanism and performance. Herein, two stable copper(I)-based coordination polymer ( NNU-32 and NNU-33(S) ) catalysts are synthesized and integrated into a CO 2 flow cell electrolyzer, which exhibited very high selectivity for electrocatalytic CO 2 -to-CH 4 conversion due to clearly inherent intramolecular cuprophilic interactions. Substitution of hydroxyl radicals for sulfate radicals during the electrocatalytic process results in an in situ dynamic crystal structure transition from NNU-33(S) to NNU-33(H), which further strengthens the cuprophilic interactions inside the catalyst structure. Consequently, NNU-33(H) with enhanced cuprophilic interactions shows an outstanding product (CH 4 ) selectivity of 82% at −0.9 V (vs reversible hydrogen electrode, j = 391 mA cm –2 ), which represents the best crystalline catalyst for electrocatalytic CO 2 -to-CH 4 conversion to date. Moreover, the detailed DFT calculations also prove that the cuprophilic interactions can effectively facilitate the electroreduction of CO 2 to CH 4 by decreasing the Gibbs free energy change of potential determining step (*H 2 COOH → *OCH 2 ). Significantly, this work first explored the effect of intrinsic cuprophilic interactions of Cu(I)-based catalysts on the electrocatalytic performance of CO 2 RR and provides an important case study for designing more stable and efficient crystalline catalysts to reduce CO 2 to high-value carbon products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.0c11450

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, L., Li, X.-X., Lang, Z.-L., Liu, Y., Liu, J., Yuan, L., Lu, W.-Y., Xia, Y.-S., Dong, L.-Z., Yuan, D.-Q., & Lan, Y.-Q.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2021-03-02
Volume
143
Issue
10
Pages
3808-3816
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W3134452802
Cited by
292
References
60
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced Cuprophilic Interactions in Crystalline Catalysts Facilitate the Highly Selective Electroreduction of CO2to CH4. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.0c11450
The paper
Zhang, L., Li, X.-X., Lang, Z.-L., Liu, Y., Liu, J., Yuan, L., Lu, W.-Y., Xia, Y.-S., Dong, L.-Z., Yuan, D.-Q., & Lan, Y.-Q. (2021). Enhanced Cuprophilic Interactions in Crystalline Catalysts Facilitate the Highly Selective Electroreduction of CO2to CH4. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c11450

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.