Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Switching between C2+ Products and CH4 in CO2 Electrolysis by Tuning the Composition and Structure of Rare-Earth/Copper Catalysts

Liu, Jiyuan, Li, Pengsong, Bi, Jiahui, Jia, Shuaiqiang, Wang, Yong, Kang, Xinchen, Sun, Xiaofu, Zhu, Qinggong, Han, Buxing·2023·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Rational regulation of the reaction pathway to produce the desired products is one of the most significant challenges in the electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR). Herein, we designed a series of rare-earth Cu catalysts with mixed phases. It was found that the products could be switched from C 2+ to CH 4 by tuning the composition and structure of the catalysts. Particularly at the Cu/Sm atomic ratio of 9/1 (Cu 9 Sm 1 –O x ), the Faradaic efficiency (FE) for C 2+ products (FE C 2+ ) could reach 81% at 700 mA cm –2 with negligible CH 4 . However, the FE of CH 4 (FE CH 4 ) was 65% at 500 mA cm –2 over Cu 1 Sm 9 –O x (Cu/Sm = 1/9), and the FE C 2+ was extremely low. Experiments and theoretical studies indicated that the stable CuSm 2 O 4 phase existed in all the catalysts within the Cu/Sm range of 9/1 to 1/9. At a high Cu content, the catalyst was composed of CuSm 2 O 4 and Cu phases. The small amount of Sm could enhance the binding strength of *CO and facilitate C–C coupling. Conversely, at a high Sm content, the catalyst was composed of CuSm 2 O 4 and Sm 2 O 3 phases. Sm could effectively stabilize bivalent Cu and enrich proton donors, lowering the reaction energy of *CO for deep hydrogenation to generate CH 4 . In both pathways, the stable CuSm 2 O 4 phase could cooperate with the Cu or Sm 2 O 3 phases, which induced the formation of different microenvironments to generate different products. This strategy also had commonality with other Cu-rare-earth (La, Pr, and Eu) catalysts to boost the CO 2 RR for C 2+ or CH 4 production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.3c05562

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., Li, P., Bi, J., Jia, S., Wang, Y., Kang, X., Sun, X., Zhu, Q., & Han, B.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2023-10-11
Volume
145
Issue
42
Pages
23037-23047
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W4387522041
Cited by
200
References
3
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Switching between C2+ Products and CH4 in CO2 Electrolysis by Tuning the Composition and Structure of Rare-Earth/Copper Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.3c05562
The paper
Liu, J., Li, P., Bi, J., Jia, S., Wang, Y., Kang, X., Sun, X., Zhu, Q., & Han, B. (2023). Switching between C2+ Products and CH4 in CO2 Electrolysis by Tuning the Composition and Structure of Rare-Earth/Copper Catalysts. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c05562

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.