The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Switching between C2+ Products and CH4 in CO2 Electrolysis by Tuning the Composition and Structure of Rare-Earth/Copper Catalysts
Abstract
Rational regulation of the reaction pathway to produce the desired products is one of the most significant challenges in the electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR). Herein, we designed a series of rare-earth Cu catalysts with mixed phases. It was found that the products could be switched from C 2+ to CH 4 by tuning the composition and structure of the catalysts. Particularly at the Cu/Sm atomic ratio of 9/1 (Cu 9 Sm 1 –O x ), the Faradaic efficiency (FE) for C 2+ products (FE C 2+ ) could reach 81% at 700 mA cm –2 with negligible CH 4 . However, the FE of CH 4 (FE CH 4 ) was 65% at 500 mA cm –2 over Cu 1 Sm 9 –O x (Cu/Sm = 1/9), and the FE C 2+ was extremely low. Experiments and theoretical studies indicated that the stable CuSm 2 O 4 phase existed in all the catalysts within the Cu/Sm range of 9/1 to 1/9. At a high Cu content, the catalyst was composed of CuSm 2 O 4 and Cu phases. The small amount of Sm could enhance the binding strength of *CO and facilitate C–C coupling. Conversely, at a high Sm content, the catalyst was composed of CuSm 2 O 4 and Sm 2 O 3 phases. Sm could effectively stabilize bivalent Cu and enrich proton donors, lowering the reaction energy of *CO for deep hydrogenation to generate CH 4 . In both pathways, the stable CuSm 2 O 4 phase could cooperate with the Cu or Sm 2 O 3 phases, which induced the formation of different microenvironments to generate different products. This strategy also had commonality with other Cu-rare-earth (La, Pr, and Eu) catalysts to boost the CO 2 RR for C 2+ or CH 4 production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels
Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Hong, F., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60323g · Cited by 2,990
CO 2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface
Dinh, C.-T., Burdyny, T., Kibria, M. G., Seifitokaldani, A., Gabardo, C. M., García de Arquer, F. P., Kiani, A., Edwards, J. P., De Luna, P., Bushuyev, O. S., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9100 · Cited by 2,515
Future CO 2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure
Davis, S. J., Caldeira, K., & Matthews, H. D. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188566 · Cited by 1,399
Cited by
Jiang, M., Wang, H., Zhu, M., Luo, X., He, Y., Wang, M., Wu, C., Zhang, L., Li, X., Liao, X., et al. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d3cs00857f · Cited by 299
Electrocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation to C2+ alcohols catalysed by Pr–Cu oxide heterointerfaces
Liu, J., Li, P., Jia, S., Wang, Y., Jing, L., Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Qian, Q., Kang, X., Sun, X., et al. (2025) · Nature Synthesis · doi:10.1038/s44160-025-00752-4 · Cited by 96
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Li, P., Bi, J., Jia, S., Wang, Y., Kang, X., Sun, X., Zhu, Q., & Han, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-10-11
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 23037-23047
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W4387522041
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Switching between C2+ Products and CH4 in CO2 Electrolysis by Tuning the Composition and Structure of Rare-Earth/Copper Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.3c05562
- The paper
- Liu, J., Li, P., Bi, J., Jia, S., Wang, Y., Kang, X., Sun, X., Zhu, Q., & Han, B. (2023). Switching between C2+ Products and CH4 in CO2 Electrolysis by Tuning the Composition and Structure of Rare-Earth/Copper Catalysts. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c05562
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.