Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 581

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Binding Site Diversity Promotes CO2 Electroreduction to Ethanol

Open access
Li, Yuguang C., Wang, Ziyun, Yuan, Tiange, Nam, Dae-Hyun, Luo, Mingchuan, Wicks, Joshua, Chen, Bin, Li, Jun, Li, Fengwang, de Arquer, F. Pelayo García, Wang, Ying, Dinh, Cao-Thang, Voznyy, Oleksandr, Sinton, David, Sargent, Edward H.·2019·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The electrochemical reduction of CO 2 has seen many record-setting advances in C 2 productivity in recent years. However, the selectivity for ethanol, a globally significant commodity chemical, is still low compared to the selectivity for products such as ethylene. Here we introduce diverse binding sites to a Cu catalyst, an approach that destabilizes the ethylene reaction intermediates and thereby promotes ethanol production. We develop a bimetallic Ag/Cu catalyst that implements the proposed design toward an improved ethanol catalyst. It achieves a record Faradaic efficiency of 41% toward ethanol at 250 mA/cm 2 and −0.67 V vs RHE, leading to a cathodic-side (half-cell) energy efficiency of 24.7%. The new catalysts exhibit an in situ Raman spectrum, in the region associated with CO stretching, that is much broader than that of pure Cu controls, a finding we account for via the diversity of binding configurations. This physical picture, involving multisite binding, accounts for the enhanced ethanol production for bimetallic catalysts, and presents a framework to design multimetallic catalysts to control reaction paths in CO 2 reductions toward desired products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.9b02945

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 581

Metadata

Authors
Li, Y. C., Wang, Z., Yuan, T., Nam, D.-H., Luo, M., Wicks, J., Chen, B., Li, J., Li, F., de Arquer, F. P. G., Wang, Y., Dinh, C.-T., Voznyy, O., Sinton, D., & Sargent, E. H.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2019-05-08
Volume
141
Issue
21
Pages
8584-8591
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2944198683
Cited by
581
References
13
FWCI
12.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Binding Site Diversity Promotes CO2 Electroreduction to Ethanol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.9b02945
The paper
Li, Y. C., Wang, Z., Yuan, T., Nam, D.-H., Luo, M., Wicks, J., Chen, B., Li, J., Li, F., de Arquer, F. P. G., Wang, Y., Dinh, C.-T., Voznyy, O., Sinton, D., & Sargent, E. H. (2019). Binding Site Diversity Promotes CO2 Electroreduction to Ethanol. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b02945

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.