The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Berry Phenolics and Their Antioxidant Activity
Abstract
Phenolic profiles of a total of 26 berry samples, together with 2 apple samples, were analyzed without hydrolysis of glycosides with HPLC. The phenolic contents among different berry genera varied considerably. Anthocyanins were the main phenolic constituents in bilberry, bog-whortleberry, and cranberry, but in cowberries, belonging also to the family Ericaceae genus Vaccinium, flavanols and procyanidins predominated. In the family Rosaceae genus Rubus (cloudberry and red raspberry), the main phenolics found were ellagitannins, and in genus Fragaria (strawberry), ellagitannins were the second largest group after anthocyanins. However, phenolic acids were dominant in rowanberries (genus Sorbus) and anthocyanins in chokeberry (genus Aronia). In the family Grossulariaceae genus Ribes (currants and gooseberry), anthocyanins predominated, as well as in crowberries (family Empetraceae genus Empetrum). In apples, hydroxycinnamic acids were the main phenolic subgroup. Extraction methods for berries and apples were studied to produce phenolic extracts with high antioxidant activity. Evaluation of antioxidant activity was performed by autoxidazing methyl linoleate (40 degrees C, in the dark). The extraction method affected remarkably both the phenolic composition and the antioxidant activity, but with statistical analysis the observed activity could not be well explained with the contents of individual phenolic subgroups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds
Kähkönen, M. P., Hopia, A. I., Vuorela, H. J., Rauha, J.-P., Pihlaja, K., Kujala, T. S., & Heinonen, M. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf990146l · Cited by 3,854
Cited by
Shahidi, F., & Ambigaipalan, P. (2015) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 · Cited by 3,081
Carlsen, M. H., Halvorsen, B. L., Holte, K., Bøhn, S. K., Dragland, S., Sampson, L., Willey, C., Senoo, H., Umezono, Y., Sanada, C., et al. (2010) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-3 · Cited by 1,118
Tannins: Current knowledge of food sources, intake, bioavailability and biological effects
Serrano, J., Puupponen‐Pimiä, R., Dauer, A., Aura, A., & Saura‐Calixto, F. (2009) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.200900039 · Cited by 810
Dai, Y., Rozema, E., Verpoorte, R., & Choi, Y. H. (2016) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2016.01.037 · Cited by 416
Karlsen, A., Retterstøl, L., Laake, P., Paur, I., Kjølsrud-Bøhn, S., Sandvik, L., & Blomhoff, R. (2007) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/137.8.1951 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Kähkönen, M. P., Hopia, A. I., & Heinonen, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-07-26
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4076-4082
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2094947208
- Cited by
- 1,030
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Berry Phenolics and Their Antioxidant Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf010152t
- The paper
- Kähkönen, M. P., Hopia, A. I., & Heinonen, M. (2001). Berry Phenolics and Their Antioxidant Activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010152t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
