Cited by 141Fermentation and Sensory AnalysisProbiotics and Fermented FoodsMicrobial metabolism and enzyme function

Effect of Gallic Acid and Catechin on Lactobacillus hilgardii 5w Growth and Metabolism of Organic Compounds

Open access
Alberto, María R., Farías, Marta E., Manca de Nadra, María C.·2001·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

The effects of different concentrations of (+)-catechin and gallic acid on the growth and metabolism of Lactobacillus hilgardii in different media were evaluated. These phenolic compounds at concentrations normally present in wine not only stimulated the growth rate but also resulted in greater cell densities during the stationary phase of growth in both media. During the first hours of growth both phenolic compounds activated the rate of glucose and fructose utilization and only catechin increased the malic acid consumption rate. Gallic acid and catechin were consumed from the beginning of L. hilgardii growth. All cited effects were increased when the cells were precultivated in the presence of phenolic compounds, especially in the FT80 medium. As stimulating agents of L. hilgardii 5w growth, gallic acid and catechin could increase the risk of spoilage lactic acid bacteria in wine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf0101915

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Catechin and gallic acid, which were metabolised by Lactobacillus hilgardii strain 5w, stimulated growth.

    “On the other hand, catechin and gallic acid, which were metabolised by Lactobacillus hilgardii strain 5w, stimulated growth (Alberto et al. 2001(Alberto et al. , 2004)).”

    From Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour (2005) · cites this paper as Alberto et al. 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alberto, M. R., Farías, M. E., & Manca de Nadra, M. C.
Affiliations
  • National University of Tucumán (AR)
  • Facultad de Bioquímica, Química y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán and Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA), Chacabuco 145, 4000 Tucumán, Argentina
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2001-08-08
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
4359-4363
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2070404680
Cited by
140
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
Keywords
gallic acid, catechins, Lactobacillus hilgardii, phenolic compounds, wine spoilage, lactic acid bacteria, bacterial growth, carbohydrate metabolism
MeSH terms
Catechin, Cell Count, Culture Media, Food Preservation, Gallic Acid, Lactobacillus, Wine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review