The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Processing Techniques at Industrial Scale on Orange Juice Antioxidant and Beneficial Health Compounds
Abstract
Phenolic compounds, vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid and L-dehydroascorbic acid), and antioxidant capacity were evaluated in orange juices manufactured by different techniques. Five processes at industrial scale (squeezing, mild pasteurization, standard pasteurization, concentration, and freezing) used in commercial orange juice manufacturing were studied. In addition, domestic squeezing (a hand processing technique) was compared with commercial squeezing (an industrial FMC single-strength extraction) to evaluate their influences on health components of orange juice. Whole orange juice was divided into soluble and cloud fractions after centrifugation. Total and individual phenolics were analyzed in both fractions by HPLC. Commercial squeezing extracted 22% more phenolics than hand squeezing. The freezing process caused a dramatic decrease in phenolics, whereas the concentration process caused a mild precipitation of these compounds to the juice cloud. In pulp, pasteurization led to degradation of several phenolic compounds, that is, caffeic acid derivatives, vicenin 2 (apigenin 6,8-di-C-glucoside), and narirutin (5,7,4'-trihydroxyflavanone-7-rutinoside) with losses of 34.5, 30.7, and 28%, respectively. Regarding vitamin C, orange juice produced by commercial squeezing contained 25% more of this compound than domestic squeezing. Mild and standard pasteurization slightly increased the total vitamin C content as the contribution from the orange solids parts, whereas concentration and freezing did not show significant changes. The content of L-ascorbic acid provided 77-96% of the total antioxidant capacity of orange juice. Mild pasteurization, standard pasteurization, concentration, and freezing did not affect the total antioxidant capacity of juice, but they did, however, in pulp, where it was reduced by 47%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shahidi, F., & Ambigaipalan, P. (2015) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 · Cited by 3,081
Carlsen, M. H., Halvorsen, B. L., Holte, K., Bøhn, S. K., Dragland, S., Sampson, L., Willey, C., Senoo, H., Umezono, Y., Sanada, C., et al. (2010) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-3 · Cited by 1,118
Klimczak, I., Małecka, M., Szlachta, M., & Gliszczyńska-Świgło, A. (2007) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2006.02.012 · Cited by 607
Ribas-Agustí, A., Martín-Belloso, O., Soliva-Fortuny, R., & Elez-Martínez, P. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1331200 · Cited by 373
Pharmacometrics of Stilbenes: Seguing Towards the Clinic
Roupe, K., Remsberg, C., Yanez, J., & Davies, N. (2006) · Current Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.2174/157488406775268246 · Cited by 309
Heinzmann, S. S., Brown, I. J., Chan, Q., Bictash, M., Dumas, M.-E., Kochhar, S., Stamler, J., Holmes, E., Elliott, P., & Nicholson, J. K. (2010) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2010.29672 · Cited by 271
Duque, A. L. R. F., Monteiro, M., Adorno, M. A. T., Sakamoto, I. K., & Sivieri, K. (2016) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2016.03.028 · Cited by 81
Gutzeit, D., Baleanu, G., Winterhalter, P., & Jerz, G. (2008) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00957.x · Cited by 59
Álvarez, R., Carvalho, C. P., Sierra, J., Lara, O., Cardona, D., & Londoño-Londoño, J. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf203353h · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Gil-Izquierdo, A., Gil, M. I., & Ferreres, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-07-30
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 5107-5114
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2020398751
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.