The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phenolic Acid Profiles in Some Small Berries
Abstract
The composition of phenolic acids in several small berries grown in Northeastern Poland, namely, low-bush blueberries, black mulberries, European juneberries, black currants, fruits of blue-berried honeysuckle, and blackberries, was determined by gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectrometry (MS). The total content of phenolic acids, identified by GC-MS, ranged from 2845.8 ± 141.0 (black mulberries) to 5418.2 ± 228.0 (blue-berried honeysuckle). Twenty phenolic acids were identified in the berries. Of these, hydroxycaffeic, m- and p- coumaric, and 3,4-dimethoxycinnamic acids were the major phenolic acids in blackberries and blueberries, m -coumaric acid was the major phenolic acid in blue-berried honeysuckle and black currant fruits, while salicylic, caffeic, and m- and p- coumaric acids were the predominant phenolic acids in European juneberries. Syringic and veratric acids were detected only in blueberries, while p -hydroxybenzoic and sinapic acids were present only in black currants and o -coumaric acid was present in blueberries and black mulberries. The phenolic acids liberated from esters and glycosidic bonds were the major fractions of phenolic acids in the berries. Keywords: Phenolics acids; low-bush blueberry ( Vaccinium myrtillus ); black mulberry ( Morus nigra ); blue-berried honeysuckle ( Lonicera caerulea ); black currant ( Ribes nigrum ); blackberry ( Rubus plicatus ); European juneberry ( Amelanchier ovalis )
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids
Rice-Evans, C. A., Miller, N. J., & Paganga, G. (1996) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9 · Cited by 9,085
Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds
Kähkönen, M. P., Hopia, A. I., Vuorela, H. J., Rauha, J.-P., Pihlaja, K., Kujala, T. S., & Heinonen, M. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf990146l · Cited by 3,854
Cited by
Seeram, N. P., Adams, L. S., Zhang, Y., Lee, R., Sand, D., Scheuller, H. S., & Heber, D. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf061750g · Cited by 770
Kaume, L., Howard, L. R., & Devareddy, L. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf203318p · Cited by 347
Karlsen, A., Paur, I., Bøhn, S. K., Sakhi, A. K., Borge, G. I., Serafini, M., Erlund, I., Laake, P., Tonstad, S., & Blomhoff, R. (2010) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-010-0092-0 · Cited by 216
Phenolic acid profiles of mangosteen fruits (Garcinia mangostana)
Zadernowski, R., Czaplicki, S., & Naczk, M. (2009) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.030 · Cited by 195
Mahayothee, B., Koomyart, I., Khuwijitjaru, P., Siriwongwilaichat, P., Nagle, M., & Müller, J. (2016) · International Journal of Food Properties · doi:10.1080/10942912.2015.1099042 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Zadernowski, R., Naczk, M., & Nesterowicz, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-02-22
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2118-2124
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2011611583
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.