The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antioxidant Activity of Citrus Limonoids, Flavonoids, and Coumarins
Abstract
A variety of in vitro models such as beta-carotene-linoleic acid, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH), superoxide, and hamster low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were used to measure the antioxidant activity of 11 citrus bioactive compounds. The compounds tested included two limonoids, limonin (Lim) and limonin 17-beta-D-glucopyranoside (LG); eight flavonoids, apigenin (Api), scutellarein (Scu), kaempferol (Kae), rutin trihydrate (Rut), neohesperidin (Neh), neoeriocitrin (Nee), naringenin (Ngn), and naringin(Ng); and a coumarin (bergapten). The above compounds were tested at concentration of 10 microM in all four methods. It was found that Lim, LG, and Ber inhibited <7%, whereas Scu, Kae, and Rut inhibited 51.3%, 47.0%, and 44.4%, respectively, using the beta-carotene-linoleate model system. Lim, LG, Rut, Scu, Nee, and Kae showed 0.5% 0.25%, 32.2%, 18.3%, 17.2%, and 12.2%, respectively, free radical scavenging activity using the DPPH method. In the superoxide model, Lim, LG, and Ber inhibited the production of superoxide radicals by 2.5-10%, while the flavonoids such as Rut, Scu, Nee, and Neh inhibited superoxide formation by 64.1%, 52.1%, 48.3%, and 37.7%, respectively. However, LG did not inhibit LDL oxidation in the hamster LDL model. But, Lim and Ber offered some protection against LDL oxidation, increasing lag time to 345 min (3-fold) and 160 min (33% increase), respectively, while both Rut and Nee increased lag time to 2800 min (23-fold). Scu and Kae increased lag time to 2140 min (18-fold) and 1879 min (15.7-fold), respectively. In general, it seems that flavonoids, which contain a chromanol ring system, had stronger antioxidant activity as compared to limonoids and bergapten, which lack the hydroxy groups. The present study confirmed that several structural features were linked to the strong antioxidant activity of flavonoids. This is the first report on the antioxidant activity of limonin, limonin glucoside, and neoeriocitrin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids
Rice-Evans, C. A., Miller, N. J., & Paganga, G. (1996) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9 · Cited by 9,085
Polyphenols: Chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance
Bravo, L. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01670.x · Cited by 4,030
Cited by
Hypolipemic and hypoglycaemic activity of bergamot polyphenols: from animal models to human studies
Mollace, V., Sacco, I., Janda, E., Malara, C., Ventrice, D., Colica, C., Visalli, V., Muscoli, S., Ragusa, S., Muscoli, C., et al. (2011) · Fitoterapia · doi:10.1016/j.fitote.2010.10.014 · Cited by 246
Gliozzi, M., Walker, R., Muscoli, S., Vitale, C., Gratteri, S., Carresi, C., Musolino, V., Russo, V., Janda, E., Ragusa, S., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.125 · Cited by 119
KIM, J. K., BAE, H., KIM, M.-J., CHOI, S. J., CHO, H. Y., HWANG, H.-J., KIM, Y. J., LIM, S. T., KIM, E. K., KIM, H. K., et al. (2009) · Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry · doi:10.1271/bbb.80859 · Cited by 44
Study on optimum extraction conditions for olive leaf extracts rich in polyphenol and flavonoid
Şahin, S., İlbay, Z., & Kırbaşlar, Ş. İ. (2015) · Separation Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/01496395.2014.966203 · Cited by 32
Bilgin, M., Sahin, S., Dramur, M. U., & Sevgili, L. M. (2013) · Chemical Engineering Communications · doi:10.1080/00986445.2012.742434 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, J., Wang, L., Walzem, R. L., Miller, E. G., Pike, L. M., & Patil, B. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-03-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2009-2014
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2092680402
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.