The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antioxidative and Antiproliferative Properties of Selected Barley (Hordeum vulgarae L.) Cultivars and Their Potential for Inhibition of Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Oxidation
Abstract
Aqueous methanolic extracts of whole kernels from six different barley cultivars, namely, Falcon, AC Metcalfe, Tyto, Tercel, Phoenix, and Peregrine, were examined for their total phenolic content (TPC), oxygen radical scavenging capacity (ORACFL), hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity (HORACFL), potency in prevention of lipid oxidation using the Rancimat method, efficacy in inhibition of Cu(II)-induced human LDL cholesterol oxidation, and antiproliferative activities using Caco-2 colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line. Total phenolic content as measured by Folin-Ciocalteu's method ranged from 0.68 to 1.19 mg of ferulic acid equiv/g of defatted material, whereas ORACFL and HORACFL values were 11.28-19.10 and 9.06-12.99 micromol of Trolox equiv/g of defatted material, respectively. Protection factor (PF), a measure of the effect of extracts on the prevention of oxidation of stripped corn oil as measured by Rancimat, ranged from 0.97 to 1.59. Furthermore, barley extracts showed 19.64-33.93% inhibition against Cu(II)-induced human LDL cholesterol oxidation at a final concentration of 0.02 mg/mL. The proliferation of Caco-2 colon cancer cells was significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited in a dose-dependent fashion in the presence of all barley extracts tested at the end of the day 4 of incubation. At the end of day 4, barley extracts rendered 29.3-51.2 and 9.3-15.9% inhibition of cell proliferation at 0.5 and 0.05 mg/mL, respectively. Phenolic extracts from whole barley kernel tested possessed high antioxidant, antiradical, and antiproliferative potentials. Therefore, inclusion of whole barley into the daily diet may render beneficial health benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents
Singleton, V. L., & Rossi, J. A. (1965) · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture · doi:10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144 · Cited by 24,852
Cited by
Shahidi, F., & Ambigaipalan, P. (2015) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 · Cited by 3,081
Phenolic Compounds of Cereals and Their Antioxidant Capacity
Van Hung, P. (2016) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2012.708909 · Cited by 444
Nutraceuticals and functional foods: Whole versus processed foods
Shahidi, F. (2009) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2008.08.004 · Cited by 437
Self-citationGupta, M., Abu‐Ghannam, N., & Gallaghar, E. (2010) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00112.x · Cited by 406
Chandrasekara, A., & Shahidi, F. (2011) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2011.03.007 · Cited by 405
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Madhujith, T., & Shahidi, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5018-5024
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2009399582
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.