Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 535

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interaction of Different Polyphenols with Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and Human Salivary α-Amylase (HSA) by Fluorescence Quenching

Soares, Susana, Mateus, Nuno, de Freitas, Victor·2007·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Phenolic compounds are responsible for major organoleptic characteristics of plant-derived food and beverages; these substances have received much attention, given that the major function of these compounds is their antioxidant ability. In the context of this study, our major aim was study the binding of several phenolic compounds such as (+)-catechin, (-)-epicatechin, (-)-epicatechin gallate, malvidin-3-glucoside, tannic acid, procyanidin B4, procyanidin B2 gallate, and procyanidin oligomers to different proteins (bovine serum albumin and human alpha-amylase) by fluorescence quenching of protein intrinsic fluorescence. From the spectra obtained, the Stern-Volmer, the apparent static, and the bimolecular quenching constants were calculated. The structure of polyphenols revealed to significantly affect the binding/quenching process; in general, the binding affinity increased with the molecular weight of polyphenol compounds and in the presence of galloyl groups. For catechin monomer and procyanidin dimer B4, the K(SV) was 14,100 and 13,800 M(-1), respectively, and for galloyl derivatives, the K(SV) was 19,500 and 21,900 M(-1), respectively. Tannic acid was shown to be the major quenching molecule for both proteins. However, comparing different proteins, the same polyphenol showed different quenching effects, which are suggested to be related to the three-dimensional structure of the proteins studied. For (+)-catechin and BSA, the K(SV) was 8700 M(-1), and with alpha-amylase, it was 14,100 M(-1); for tannic acid, the K(SV) was 10,0548 and 11,0674 M(-1), respectively. From the results obtained, besides the main binding analysis performed, we conclude that this technique is more sensitive than thought because we can detect several interactions that have not been proven by other methods, namely, nephelometry. Overall, fluorescence quenching has proven to be a very sensitive technique with many potentialities to analyze the interaction between polyphenols and proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf070905x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Soares, S., Mateus, N., & de Freitas, V.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2007-07-18
Volume
55
Issue
16
Pages
6726-6735
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2018607875
Cited by
535
References
0
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.