Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural products for glycaemic control: Polyphenols as inhibitors of alpha-amylase

Sun, Lijun, Warren, Fredrick J., Gidley, Michael J.·2019·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Abstract Background α-Amylase plays an important role in starch digestion, the main source of exogenous glucose in the human diet. Retarding glucose absorption through delaying digestion of starchy foods by inhibiting α-amylase in the digestive tract has potential as a management and/or therapeutic approach to type II diabetes. Polyphenols have been reported to have inhibitory activity against the enzyme. Scope and approach This review provides an overview of structure-activity relationships of dietary polyphenols inhibiting α-amylase and the underlying mechanisms. The methods applied to characterize binding interactions between polyphenols and α-amylase, as well as the relationships between the constants obtained from these methods are discussed. As polyphenols can interact with both polysaccharides and α-amylase, the potential effects of polysaccharides on the binding of polyphenols with α-amylase are also summarised. Key findings and conclusions The inhibition of α-amylase by polyphenols results from binding interactions between the enzyme and polyphenols. The galloyl moiety in polyphenols plays an important role. IC50, inhibition kinetics, fluorescence quenching, differential scanning calorimetry, isothermal titration calorimetry and molecular docking can be comprehensively combined to analyze the binding interactions, as the constants obtained from these methods can be correlated. Soluble polysaccharides may reduce the binding and inhibitory action of polyphenols against α-amylase. Most work reported in this review is from in vitro studies, so if and how the binding interactions affect starch digestion in vivo need to be further studied.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.009

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Sun, L., Warren, F. J., & Gidley, M. J.
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
91
Pages
262-273
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2960032553
Cited by
285
References
60
FWCI
16.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural products for glycaemic control: Polyphenols as inhibitors of alpha-amylase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.009
The paper
Sun, L., Warren, F. J., & Gidley, M. J. (2019). Natural products for glycaemic control: Polyphenols as inhibitors of alpha-amylase. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.