Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 378

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Ultrasound Pretreatment on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Soy Protein Isolates and on the Emulsifying Properties of Hydrolysates

Chen, Lin, Chen, Jianshe, Ren, Jiaoyan, Zhao, Mouming·2011·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Soy protein isolate (SPI) was modified by ultrasound pretreatment (200 W, 400 W, 600 W) and controlled papain hydrolysis, and the emulsifying properties of SPIH (SPI hydrolysates) and USPIH (ultrasound pretreated SPIH) were investigated. Analysis of mean droplet sizes and creaming indices of emulsions formed by SPIH and USPIH showed that some USPIH had markedly improved emulsifying capability and emulsion stabilization against creaming during quiescent storage. Compared with control SPI and SPIH-0.58% degree of hydrolysis (DH), USPIH-400W-1.25% (USPIH pretreated under 400W sonication and hydrolyzed to 1.25% DH) was capable of forming a stable fine emulsion (d43=1.79 μm) at a lower concentration (3.0% w/v). A variety of physicochemical and interfacial properties of USPIH-400W products have been investigated in relation to DH and emulsifying properties. SDS-PAGE showed that ultrasound pretreatment could significantly improve the accessibility of some subunits (α-7S and A-11S) in soy proteins to papain hydrolysis, resulting in changes in DH, protein solubility (PS), surface hydrophobicity (H0), and secondary structure for USPIH-400W. Compared with control SPI and SPIH-0.58%, USPIH-400W-1.25% had a higher protein adsorption fraction (Fads) and a lower saturation surface load (Γsat), which is mainly due to its higher PS and random coil content, and may explain its markedly improved emulsifying capability. This study demonstrated that combined ultrasound pretreatment and controlled enzymatic hydrolysis could be an effective method for the functionality modification of globular proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf103771x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Santiago L. G., 1998, Lebens.-Wiss. Technol., 31, 259, 10.1006/fstl.1997.0351 · DOI
  2. Molina E., 2001, Food Hydrocolloids, 15, 263, 10.1016/S0268-005X(01)00023-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Roesch R. R., 2002, J. Food Sci., 7, 2837, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb08825.x · DOI
  4. Lee K. H., 2003, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 80, 85, 10.1007/s11746-003-0656-6 · DOI
  5. Walstra P., 1997, Food Colloids: Proteins, Lipids and Polysaccharides, 367
  6. Walstra P., 1993, Chem. Eng. Sci., 48, 333, 10.1016/0009-2509(93)80021-H · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dickinson E., 1992, Emulsions. An Introduction to Food Colloids
  8. McClements D. J., 2004, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 9, 305, 10.1016/j.cocis.2004.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Damodaran S., 2005, J. Food Sci., 70, 54, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb07150.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Mahmoud M. L., 1994, Food Technol., 48, 89
  11. Panyam D., 1996, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 7, 120, 10.1016/0924-2244(96)10012-1 · DOI
  12. Jung S., 2004, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 81, 953, 10.1007/s11746-004-1007-3 · DOI
  13. Ven C. V. D., 2001, J. Agric. Food Chem., 49, 5005, 10.1021/jf010144c · DOI
  14. Lamsal B. P., 2007, Lebens.-Wiss. Technol., 40, 1215, 10.1016/j.lwt.2006.08.021 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Nielsen P. M., 1997, Food Proteins and Their Applications, 43
  16. Govindaraju K., 2007, Lebens.-Wiss. Technol., 40, 1056, 10.1016/j.lwt.2006.07.004 · DOI
  17. Tsumura K., 2004, J. Food Sci., 69, 363, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb10698.x · DOI
  18. Chen L., 2010, Food Hydrocolloids
  19. Peñas E., 2004, Food Chem., 85, 641, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.07.025 · DOI
  20. Karki B, 2009, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 86, 1021, 10.1007/s11746-009-1433-0 · DOI
  21. Jambrak A. R., 2008, J. Food Eng., 86, 281, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Jambrak A. R., 2009, J. Food Eng., 93, 386, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Mason T. J., 1996, Ultrason. Sonochem., 3, 253, 10.1016/S1350-4177(96)00034-X · DOI · Paper page
  24. Jia J. Q., 2010, Food Chem., 119, 336, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.06.036 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Tang C. H., 2007, J. Food Eng., 82, 568, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.01.029 · DOI
  26. Burgaud I., 1990, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 25, 39, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1990.tb01057.x · DOI
  27. Moschakis T., 2005, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 284, 714, 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.10.036 · DOI
  28. Laemmli U. K., 1970, Nature, 227, 680, 10.1038/227680a0 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Petruccelli S., 1994, J. Agric. Food Chem., 42, 2161, 10.1021/jf00046a017 · DOI
  30. Haskard C. A., 1998, J. Agric. Food Chem., 46, 2671, 10.1021/jf970876y · DOI · Paper page
  31. Paton S., 1986, Lipids, 21, 170, 10.1007/BF02534441 · DOI
  32. McClements D. J., 2007, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 47, 611, 10.1080/10408390701289292 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Ye A., 2004, Colloids Surf., B., 38, 1, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.07.011 · DOI
  34. Wu W. U., 1998, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 75, 845, 10.1007/s11746-998-0235-0 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Caessens P. W., 1999, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 140, 73, 10.1016/S0167-4838(98)00274-X · DOI
  36. Dickinson E., 1998, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 94, 1657, 10.1039/a801167b · DOI

Cited by

See all 378

Metadata

Authors
Chen, L., Chen, J., Ren, J., & Zhao, M.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2011-02-17
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
2600-2609
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2319957515
Cited by
378
References
0
FWCI
11.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Ultrasound Pretreatment on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Soy Protein Isolates and on the Emulsifying Properties of Hydrolysates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf103771x
The paper
Chen, L., Chen, J., Ren, J., & Zhao, M. (2011). Effects of Ultrasound Pretreatment on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Soy Protein Isolates and on the Emulsifying Properties of Hydrolysates. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf103771x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.