Cited by 316Food and Agricultural SciencesProteins in Food SystemsMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) for soy protein isolates and concentrate: Criteria for evaluation

Hughes, Glenna J., Ryan, David J., Mukherjea, Ratna, Schasteen, Charles S.·2011·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Protein quality, as determined by the PDCAAS method, is a measure of a protein's ability to provide adequate levels of essential amino acids for human needs. PDCAAS is calculated using an amino acid profile and true digestibility of a food protein. Soy protein is recognized as a high quality plant protein, but published PDCAAS values may vary based on the soy protein ingredient as well as the reproducibility and accuracy of the testing methods. Comparison of PDCAAS values for four differently processed soy ingredients, including three isolated soy proteins (ISP) and one soy protein concentrate (SPC), was made using two different laboratories with evaluation of the impact of the reproducibility and accuracy of amino acid profiles. PDCAAS calculations, using amino acid values from one laboratory, yielded a truncated PDCAAS of 1.00 for all four ingredients, while a second laboratory provided statistically significantly lower scores (0.95-1.00). We conclude that analytical method error can be a significant contributor to PDCAAS differences and can be mitigated by the application of amino acid nitrogen recovery correction factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf203220v

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, G. J., Ryan, D. J., Mukherjea, R., & Schasteen, C. S.
Affiliations
Solae, LLC, 4300 Duncan Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
Corresponding author
Hughes, Glenna J.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2011-11-16
Volume
59
Issue
23
Pages
12707-12712
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2023435153
Cited by
316
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
PDCAAS, soy protein isolate, soy protein concentrate, protein quality, essential amino acids, true digestibility, amino acid composition, interlaboratory reproducibility, plant proteins
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Amino Acids, Essential, Child, Preschool, Dietary Proteins, Digestion, Humans, Nutritive Value, Reference Values, Soybean Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review