Cited by 207Pomegranate: compositions and health benefitsGut microbiota and healthPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Time course production of urolithins from ellagic acid by human gut microbiota

García-Villalba, Rocío, Beltrán, David, Espín, Juan Carlos, Selma, María Victoria, Tomás-Barberán, Francisco A.·2013·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Ellagic acid (EA) is converted to urolithins by gut microbiota. Urolithins have beneficial biological effects in humans, but differences in urolithin production capacity among individuals have been shown. Therefore, the identification of the urolithin production pathways and the microorganisms implicated is of high interest. EA was incubated with gut microbiota from two volunteers able to produce urolithins but with different in vivo urolithin profiles (urolithin A and isourolithin A producers). The metabolic capabilities observed in vivo were retained in vitro. Both individuals showed a much higher abundance of Clostridium leptum group of Firmicutes phylum than Bacteroides / Prevotella . EA was either dissolved in DMSO or suspended in water. DMSO increased EA solubility but decreased urolithin production rate due to a delay in growth of some microbial groups, principally, Clostridium coccoides . This allowed the detection of catabolic intermediates [urolithins M-5, M-6, M-7, C, and 2,3,8,10-tetrahydroxy urolithin (urolithin E)]. Bacteria from C. coccoides group (or genera co-occurring in vivo with this group) seem to be involved in production of different urolithins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf402498b

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UroA can only be detected in ∼40%-50% of human subjects upon consumption of EA/ET-containing diets.

    “However, UroA can only be detected in ∼ 40%–50% of human subjects upon consumption of EA/ET-containing diets.131,136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
García-Villalba, R., Beltrán, D., Espín, J. C., Selma, M. V., & Tomás-Barberán, F. A.
Affiliations
  • Research Group on Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, CEBAS-CSIC, Espinardo, Murcia 30100, Spain
  • Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (ES)
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2013-09-06
Volume
61
Issue
37
Pages
8797-8806
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2329681600
Cited by
207
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
ellagic acid, urolithins, gut microbiota, Clostridium coccoides, urolithin A, polyphenol metabolism
MeSH terms
Adult, Bacteria, Coumarins, Ellagic Acid, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Gastrointestinal Tract, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review