Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 677

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nature of Polyphenol−Protein Interactions

Siebert, Karl J., Troukhanova, Nataliia V., Lynn, Penelope Y.·1996·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Proteins and polyphenols were combined in model systems, and the resulting hazes were measured by light scattering. The amount of haze formed depends both on the concentrations of protein and polyphenol and on their ratio. A conceptual model in which a protein molecule has a fixed number of polyphenol binding sites explains the observed behavior and has implications for turbidimetric methods for estimating haze-active protein and haze-active polyphenol in beverages. The ranking of haze-forming activity of the test polypeptides was different with tannic acid than with catechin; this indicates differences in binding site availability, bridging ability, or specificity for the two polyphenols. More haze was observed when model systems were heated, suggesting that polyphenol binding sites are exposed when protein hydrogen bonds are broken. Freshly formed haze dissolved when dimethylformamide or dioxane was added; this may be useful for recovering compounds from isolated hazes for analysis. Keywords: Haze-active protein; haze-active polyphenol; beverages; model systems; gelatin; tannic acid

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf9502459

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Siebert, K. J., Troukhanova, N. V., & Lynn, P. Y.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
80-85
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2085052208
Cited by
677
References
5
FWCI
16.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.