Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Electronegative Substituents on the Binding Affinity of Catechol-Derived Anchors to Fe3O4 Nanoparticles

Open access
Amstad, Esther, Gehring, Andreas U., Fischer, Håkon, Nagaiyanallur, Venkatamaran V., Hähner, Georg, Textor, Marcus, Reimhult, Erik·2011·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Successful applications of nanoparticles are often limited by insufficient nanoparticle stability due to low binding affinity of dispersants. However, excellent Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticle stability was reported in a recent study ( Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 4042−4048) that compared different catechol derivative-anchored low molecular weight dispersants. Here, we investigate mechanistic binding aspects of five different anchors from this study that showed radically different efficiencies as dispersant anchors, namely nitroDOPA, nitrodopamine, DOPA, dopamine, and mimosine, using electron paramagnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and UV−vis spectroscopy. We demonstrate enhanced electron delocalization for nitrocatechols binding to Fe 2+ compared to unsubstituted catechols if they are adsorbed on Fe 3 O 4 surfaces. However a too high affinity of mimosine to Fe 3+ was shown to lead to gradual dissolution of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles through complexation followed by dissociation of the complex. Thus, the binding affinity of anchors should be optimized rather than maximized to achieve nanoparticle stability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp1109306

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Amstad, E., Gehring, A. U., Fischer, H., Nagaiyanallur, V. V., Hähner, G., Textor, M., & Reimhult, E.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2010-12-15
Volume
115
Issue
3
Pages
683-691
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W1978051888
Cited by
163
References
2
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.