Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Liquid-Phase Gallium–Indium Alloy Electronics with Microcontact Printing

Tabatabai, Arya, Fassler, Andrew, Usiak, Claire, Majidi, Carmel·2013·Langmuir

Abstract

Liquid-phase electronic circuits are patterned on an elastomer substrate with a microcontact printer. The printer head dips into a pool of a liquid-phase gallium-indium alloy, e.g., eutectic gallium-indium (EGaIn) or gallium-indium-tin (Galinstan), and deposits a single drop on a silicone elastomer substrate. After patterned deposition, the liquid-phase circuit is sealed with an additional layer of silicone elastomer. We also demonstrate patterned deposition of the liquid-phase GaIn alloy with a molded polydimethylsiloxane stamp that is manually inked and pressed into an elastomer substrate. As with other liquid-phase electronics produced through needle injection or masked deposition, the circuit is elastically deformable and can be stretched to several times its natural length without losing electronic functionality. In contrast to existing fabrication techniques, microcontact printing and stamp lithography can be used to produce circuits with any planar geometric feature, including electrodes with large planar area, intersecting and closed-loop wires, and combs with multiple terminal electrodes. In air, the surface of the coalesced droplets oxidize to form a thin oxide skin that preserves the shape of the circuit during sealing. This first demonstration of soft-lithography fabrication with liquid-phase GaIn alloy expands the space of allowable circuit geometries and eliminates the need for mold or mask fabrication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la401245d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Tabatabai, A., Fassler, A., Usiak, C., & Majidi, C.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2013-05-09
Volume
29
Issue
20
Pages
6194-6200
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W1980023363
Cited by
293
References
0
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.