Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Doxorubicin as a Molecular Nanotheranostic Agent: Effect of Doxorubicin Encapsulation in Micelles or Nanoemulsions on the Ultrasound-Mediated Intracellular Delivery and Nuclear Trafficking

Open access
Mohan, Praveena, Rapoport, Natalya·2010·Molecular Pharmaceutics

Abstract

Doxorubicin (DOX) is one of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs and is a popular research tool due to the inherent fluorescence of the DOX molecule. After DOX injection, fluorescence imaging of organs or cells can provide information on drug biodistribution. Therapeutic and imaging capabilities combined in a DOX molecule make it an excellent theranostic agent. However, DOX fluorescence depends on a number of factors that should be taken into consideration when interpreting results of DOX fluorescence measurements. Discussing these problems is the main thrust of the current paper. The sensitivity of DOX fluorescence intensity to DOX concentration, local microenvironment, and interaction with model cellular components is illustrated by fluorescence spectra of paired DOX/phospholipid, DOX/histone, DOX/DNA, and triple DOX/histone/DNA and DOX/phospholipid/DNA systems. DOX fluorescence is dramatically quenched upon intercalation into the DNA; DOX fluorescence is also self-quenched at high concentrations of molecularly dissolved DOX; in contrast, DOX fluorescence is increased after binding to the histone or partitioning into the phospholipid phase of PEG-phospholipid micelles or hydrophobic cores of polymeric micelles. While flow cytometry is commonly used for characterization of DOX intracellular uptake, the above aspects of DOX fluorescence may significantly complicate interpretation of flow cytometry results. High cell fluorescence measured by flow cytometry may provide deceptive information on the actual intracellular DOX concentration and may not correlate with the therapeutic efficacy if DOX does not penetrate into the site of action in cell nuclei. These problems are illustrated in the experiments on the intracellular trafficking of DOX encapsulated in poly(ethylene glycol)-co-polycaprolactone (PEG-PCL) micelles or PEG-PCL stabilized perfluorocarbon nanodroplets, with and without the application of ultrasound used as an external trigger. For efficient encapsulation in micelle cores, DOX is usually deprotonated, which removes the positive charge and enhances hydrophobicity of DOX molecule. It was found that the deprotonated DOX accumulated in the cell cytoplasm but did not penetrate into the cell nuclei. The same was true for the DOX encapsulated in micelles or nanodroplets, which may explain their low therapeutic efficacy in the absence of ultrasound. Ultrasound triggers DOX trafficking into the cell nuclei, which is especially pronounced in the presence of nanoemulsions that convert into microbubbles under the ultrasound action. Microbubble cavitation results in the transient permeabilization of both plasma and nuclear membranes, thus allowing DOX penetration into the cell nuclei, which dramatically enhances therapeutic efficacy of DOX-loaded nanodroplet systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/mp100269f

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Mohan, P., & Rapoport, N.
Venue
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Published
2010-10-27
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
1959-1973
ISSN
  • 1543-8384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-8392
OpenAlex
W2029753193
Cited by
331
References
7
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.