The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbon Nanotube Sensors for Gas and Organic Vapor Detection
Abstract
A gas sensor, fabricated by the simple casting of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) on an interdigitated electrode (IDE), is presented for gas and organic vapor detection at room temperature. The sensor responses are linear for concentrations of sub ppm to hundreds of ppm with detection limits of 44 ppb for NO 2 and 262 ppb for nitrotoluene. The time is on the order of seconds for the detection response and minutes for the recovery. The variation of the sensitivity is less than 6% for all of the tested devices, comparable with commercial metal oxide or polymer microfilm sensors while retaining the room-temperature high sensitivity of the SWNT transistor sensors and manufacturability of the commercial sensors. The extended detection capability from gas to organic vapors is attributed to direct charge transfer on individual semiconducting SWNT conductivity with additional electron hopping effects on intertube conductivity through physically adsorbed molecules between SWNTs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanostructures in Biodiagnostics
Rosi, N. L., & Mirkin, C. A. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030067f · Cited by 4,603
Flexible electronics based on inorganic nanowires
Liu, Z., Xu, J., Chen, D., & Shen, G. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00116h · Cited by 512
Amperometric Gas SensorsA Review
Stetter, J. R., & Li, J. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0681039 · Cited by 485
Self-citationCui, S., Wen, Z., Huang, X., Chang, J., & Chen, J. (2015) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201402923 · Cited by 406
Self-Activated Transparent All-Graphene Gas Sensor with Endurance to Humidity and Mechanical Bending
Kim, Y. H., Kim, S. J., Kim, Y.-J., Shim, Y.-S., Kim, S. Y., Hong, B. H., & Jang, H. W. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b04680 · Cited by 332
Wu, J., Wu, Z., Han, S., Yang, B.-R., Gui, X., Tao, K., Liu, C., Miao, J., & Norford, L. K. (2019) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.8b17437 · Cited by 225
Hydrogen gas sensor based on metal oxide nanoparticles decorated graphene transistor
Zhang, Z., Zou, X., Xu, L., Liao, L., Liu, W., Ho, J., Xiao, X., Jiang, C., & Li, J. (2015) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c5nr01924a · Cited by 212
Self-citationGraphene nanoelectronic heterodyne sensor for rapid and sensitive vapour detection
Kulkarni, G. S., Reddy, K., Zhong, Z., & Fan, X. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5376 · Cited by 189
Chen, P., Sukcharoenchoke, S., Ryu, K., Gomez de Arco, L., Badmaev, A., Wang, C., & Zhou, C. (2010) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200904005 · Cited by 166
Review of Gravimetric Sensing of Volatile Organic Compounds
McGinn, C. K., Lamport, Z. A., & Kymissis, I. (2020) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.0c00333 · Cited by 152
Sood, Y., Singh, K., Mudila, H., Lokhande, P. E., Singh, L., Kumar, D., Kumar, A., Mubarak, N. M., & Dehghani, M. H. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33643 · Cited by 106
Ultrasensitive reversible oxygen sensing by using liquid-exfoliated MoS 2 nanoparticles
Kim, Y. H., Kim, K. Y., Choi, Y. R., Shim, Y.-S., Jeon, J.-M., Lee, J.-H., Kim, S. Y., Han, S., & Jang, H. W. (2016) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c6ta01277a · Cited by 90
Altalhi, T., Kumeria, T., Santos, A., & Losic, D. (2013) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.003 · Cited by 39
Nanoelectronic Heterodyne Sensor: A New Electronic Sensing Paradigm
Kulkarni, G. S., Zang, W., & Zhong, Z. (2016) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00329 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Lu, Y., Ye, Q., Cinke, M., Han, J., & Meyyappan, M.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-06-13
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 929-933
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2146161411
- Cited by
- 1,810
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
