Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

High Sensitivity of In Vivo Detection of Gold Nanorods Using a Laser Optoacoustic Imaging System

Eghtedari, Mohammad, Oraevsky, Alexander, Copland, John A., Kotov, Nicholas A., Conjusteau, Andre, Motamedi, Massoud·2007·Nano Letters

Abstract

The development of a contrast agent for a laser optoacoustic imaging system (LOIS) can significantly widen preclinical and clinical applications of this imaging modality for early detection of cancerous tumors. Gold nanorods were engineered to enhance the contrast for optoacoustic imaging. Under in vivo conditions, 25 microL of gold nanorods solution at a concentration of 1.25 pM were injected into nude mice and detected using a single-channel acoustic transducer. LOIS was used to visualize the distribution of gold nanoparticles at a concentration of 125 pM in vivo when 100 microL of solution of gold nanoparticles was delivered subcutaneously. Our results suggest that LOIS can be used for in vivo detection of gold nanorods at low concentrations and the nanoparticles can be engineered to enhance the diagnostic power of optoacoustic imaging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl070557d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Eghtedari, M., Oraevsky, A., Copland, J. A., Kotov, N. A., Conjusteau, A., & Motamedi, M.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2007-06-15
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
1914-1918
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2135856533
Cited by
374
References
0
FWCI
25.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.