The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Vivo Skin Penetration of Quantum Dot Nanoparticles in the Murine Model: The Effect of UVR
Open accessAbstract
Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) has widespread effects on the biology and integrity of the skin barrier. Research on the mechanisms that drive these changes, as well as their effect on skin barrier function, has been ongoing since the 1980s. However, no studies have examined the impact of UVR on nanoparticle skin penetration. Nanoparticles (NP) are commonly used in sunscreens and other cosmetics, and since consumer use of sunscreen is often applied to sun damaged skin, the effect of UVR on NP skin penetration is a concern due to potential toxicity. In this study, we investigate NP skin penetration by employing an in vivo semiconductor quantum dot nanoparticle (QD) model system. This model system improves NP imaging capabilities and provides additional primary interest due to widespread and expanding use of QD in research applications and manufacturing. In our experiments, carboxylated QD were applied to the skin of SKH-1 mice in a glycerol vehicle with and without UVR exposure. The skin collection and penetration patterns were evaluated 8 and 24 h after QD application using tissue histology, confocal microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with EDAX analysis. Low levels of penetration were seen in both the non-UVR exposed mice and the UVR exposed mice. Qualitatively higher levels of penetration were observable in the UVR exposed mice. These results are the first for in vivo QD skin penetration, and provide important insight into the ability of QD to penetrate intact and UVR compromised skin barrier. Our findings raise concern that NP of similar size and surface chemistry, such as metal oxide NP found in sunscreens, may also penetrate UV damaged skin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dabbousi, B. O., Rodriguez-Viejo, J., Mikulec, F. V., Heine, J. R., Mattoussi, H., Ober, R., Jensen, K. F., & Bawendi, M. G. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp971091y · Cited by 4,229
Reeves, J. F., Davies, S. J., Dodd, N. J. F., & Jha, A. N. (2008) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.12.010 · Cited by 441
Ryman-Rasmussen, J. P., Riviere, J. E., & Monteiro-Riviere, N. A. (2007) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700508 · Cited by 357
Biological interactions of quantum dot nanoparticles in skin and in human epidermal keratinocytes
ZHANG, L., YU, W., COLVIN, V, & MONTEIRORIVIERE, N. (2008) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2007.12.022 · Cited by 247
Cited by
Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano–bio interface
Nel, A. E., Mädler, L., Velegol, D., Xia, T., Hoek, E. M. V., Somasundaran, P., Klaessig, F., Castranova, V., & Thompson, M. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2442 · Cited by 7,083
Effect of Surface Properties on Nanoparticle–Cell Interactions
Verma, A., & Stellacci, F. (2010) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.200901158 · Cited by 2,619
Sharifi, S., Behzadi, S., Laurent, S., Laird Forrest, M., Stroeve, P., & Mahmoudi, M. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15188f · Cited by 1,460
Emergence of Nanoplastic in the Environment and Possible Impact on Human Health
Lehner, R., Weder, C., Petri-Fink, A., & Rothen-Rutishauser, B. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b05512 · Cited by 1,242
Quantum dots: bright and versatile in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging biosensors
Wegner, K. D., & Hildebrandt, N. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00532e · Cited by 984
Metadata
- Authors
- Mortensen, L. J., Oberdörster, G., Pentland, A. P., & DeLouise, L. A.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-08-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2779-2787
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2102051171
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.