The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluating Nanoparticle Sensor Design for Intracellular pH Measurements
Abstract
Particle-based nanosensors have over the past decade been designed for optical fluorescent-based ratiometric measurements of pH in living cells. However, quantitative and time-resolved intracellular measurements of pH in endosomes and lysosomes using particle nanosensors are challenging, and there is a need to improve measurement methodology. In the present paper, we have successfully carried out time-resolved pH measurements in endosomes and lyosomes in living cells using nanoparticle sensors and show the importance of sensor choice for successful quantification. We have studied two nanoparticle-based sensor systems that are internalized by endocytosis and elucidated important factors in nanosensor design that should be considered in future development of new sensors. From our experiments it is clear that it is highly important to use sensors that have a broad measurement range, as erroneous quantification of pH is an unfortunate result when measuring pH too close to the limit of the sensitive range of the sensors. Triple-labeled nanosensors with a pH measurement range of 3.2-7.0, which was synthesized by adding two pH-sensitive fluorophores with different pK(a) to each sensor, seem to be a solution to some of the earlier problems found when measuring pH in the endosome-lysosome pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ratiometric optical nanoprobes enable accurate molecular detection and imaging
Huang, X., Song, J., Yung, B. C., Huang, X., Xiong, Y., & Chen, X. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00612h · Cited by 820
Optical Sensing and Imaging of pH Values: Spectroscopies, Materials, and Applications
Steinegger, A., Wolfbeis, O. S., & Borisov, S. M. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00451 · Cited by 622
Wan, Q., Chen, S., Shi, W., Li, L., & Ma, H. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201405742 · Cited by 420
Zhou, K., Liu, H., Zhang, S., Huang, X., Wang, Y., Huang, G., Sumer, B. D., & Gao, J. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja300176w · Cited by 344
Quantum Dot–Fluorescent Protein FRET Probes for Sensing Intracellular pH
Dennis, A. M., Rhee, W. J., Sotto, D., Dublin, S. N., & Bao, G. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn2038077 · Cited by 340
Nanoscale Metal–Organic Frameworks for Real-Time Intracellular pH Sensing in Live Cells
He, C., Lu, K., & Lin, W. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja507333c · Cited by 294
Insights in Chloroquine Action: Perspectives and Implications in Malaria and COVID‐19
Pillat, M. M., Krüger, A., Guimarães, L. M. F., Lameu, C., de Souza, E. E., Wrenger, C., & Ulrich, H. (2020) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.24190 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Benjaminsen, R. V., Sun, H., Henriksen, J. R., Christensen, N. M., Almdal, K., & Andresen, T. L.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-07-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 5864-5873
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W1972875793
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.