Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Responses of Human Lung Epithelial Cells to the Toxicity of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Inferred from Whole Genome Expression Analysis

Open access
Hanagata, Nobutaka, Zhuang, Fei, Connolly, Sarah, Li, Jie, Ogawa, Nobuhiro, Xu, Mingsheng·2011·ACS Nano
DOI 10.1021/nn202966t
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study proposes a molecular mechanism for lung epithelial A549 cell response to copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) related to Cu ions released from CuO-NPs. Cells that survived exposure to CuO-NPs arrested the cell cycle as a result of the downregulation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), cell division control 2 (CDC2), cyclin B1 (CCNB1), target protein for Xklp2 (TPX2), and aurora kinase A (AURKA) and B (AURKB). Furthermore, cell death was avoided through the induced expression of nuclear receptors NR4A1 and NR4A3 and growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible 45 β and γ (GADD45B and GADD45G, respectively). The downregulation of CDC2, CCNB1, TPX2, AURKA, and AURKB, the expressions of which are involved in cell cycle arrest, was attributed to Cu ions released from CuO-NPs into medium. NR4A1 and NR4A3 expression was also induced by Cu ions released into the medium. The expression of GADD45B and GADD45G activated the p38 pathway that was involved in escape from cell death. The upregulation of GADD45B and GADD45G was not observed with Cu ions released into medium but was observed in cells exposed to CuO-NPs. However, because the expression of the genes was also induced by Cu ion concentrations higher than that released from CuO-NPs into the medium, the expression appeared to be triggered by Cu ions released from CuO-NPs taken up into cells. We infer that, for cells exposed to CuO-NPs, those able to make such a molecular response survived and those unable to do so eventually died.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn202966t

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Xu M., 2010, Biomaterials, 31, 8022, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.022 · DOI
  2. Hanagata N., 2010, Nano Biomed., 2, 153
  3. Gabbay J., 2006, J. Ind. Textiles, 35, 323, 10.1177/1528083706060785 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Chang H., 2005, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci., 10, 128
  5. Zhou K., 2006, Nanotechnology, 17, 3939, 10.1088/0957-4484/17/15/055 · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/17/15/055
  6. Cioffi N., 2005, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 381, 607, 10.1007/s00216-004-2761-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Xu L., 2011, Mater. Exp., 1, 74, 10.1166/mex.2011.1010 · doi:10.1166/mex.2011.1010
  8. Ahamed M., 2010, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 396, 578, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.156 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Midander K., 2009, Small, 5, 389, 10.1002/smll.200801220 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Karlsson H. L, 2008, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 21, 1726, 10.1021/tx800064j · DOI · Paper page
  11. Zhan Q., 1994, Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 2361
  12. Fornace A. J., 1992, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 663, 139, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb38657.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. Papathanasiou M. A., 1989, Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 4196
  14. Zhang W., 1999, Oncogene, 18, 4899, 10.1038/sj.onc.1202885 · DOI
  15. Beadling C., 1993, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 90, 2719, 10.1073/pnas.90.7.2719 · DOI
  16. Liebermann D. A., 1998, Oncogene Rev., 17, 3319, 10.1038/sj.onc.1202574 · DOI
  17. Vairapandi M., 2002, J. Cell Physiol., 192, 327, 10.1002/jcp.10140 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Wang X. W., 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96, 3706, 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3706 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Jin S., 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 16602, 10.1074/jbc.M000284200 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Vairapandi M., 1996, Oncogene, 12, 2579
  21. Smith M. L., 1994, Science, 266, 1376, 10.1126/science.7973727 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Smith M. L., 2000, Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 3705, 10.1128/MCB.20.10.3705-3714.2000 · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.10.3705-3714.2000 · Paper page
  23. Smith M. L., 1996, Oncogene, 13, 2255
  24. Gupta M., 2005, Oncogene, 24, 7170, 10.1038/sj.onc.1208847 · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208847
  25. Gupta M., 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 17552, 10.1074/jbc.M600950200 · DOI
  26. Amanullah A., 2003, Nature, 424, 741, 10.1038/424741b · DOI
  27. Takekawa M., 1998, Cell, 95, 521, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81619-0 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Selvakumaran M., 1994, Oncogene, 9, 1791
  29. Selvakumaran M., 1994, Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 2352
  30. Zhang W., 2001, Int. J. Oncol., 18, 749
  31. Yoo J., 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 43001, 10.1074/jbc.M307869200 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Vairapandi M., 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 16810, 10.1074/jbc.275.22.16810 · DOI
  33. Azam N., 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 2766, 10.1074/jbc.M005626200 · DOI
  34. Harkin D. P., 1999, Cell, 97, 575, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80769-2 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kojima S., 1999, FEBS Lett., 446, 313, 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00234-3 · DOI
  36. Hildesheim J., 2002, Cancer Res., 62, 7305
  37. Cazzalini O., 2003, Cell Cycle, 2, 596, 10.4161/cc.2.6.502 · DOI
  38. O’Connor P. M., 1997, Cancer Surv., 29, 151
  39. Elledge S. J., 1996, Science, 274, 1664, 10.1126/science.274.5293.1664 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Kufer T. A., 2002, J. Cell Biol., 158, 617, 10.1083/jcb.200204155 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Lu B., 2001, Immunity, 14, 583, 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00141-8 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Yang J., 2001, Nat. Immunol., 2, 157, 10.1038/84264 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Angel P., 1991, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1072, 129
  44. Karin M., 1997, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 9, 240, 10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80068-3 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Shaulian E., 2001, Oncogene, 20, 2390, 10.1038/sj.onc.1204383 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Li Q. X., 2006, Histol. Histopathol., 21, 533
  47. Moll U. M., 2006, Oncogene, 25, 4725, 10.1038/sj.onc.1209601 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Giono L. E., 2006, J. Cell. Physiol., 209, 13, 10.1002/jcp.20689 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Guillouf C., 1995, Blood, 85, 2691, 10.1182/blood.V85.10.2691.bloodjournal85102691 · DOI
  50. Vousden K. H., 2000, Cell, 103, 691, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00171-9 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Andrews G. K., 2000, Biochem. Pharmacol., 59, 95, 10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00301-9 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Huang Y.-C. T., 2009, Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., 41, 544, 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0064OC · DOI
  53. Min K.-S., 2005, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 204, 9, 10.1016/j.taap.2004.08.014 · DOI
  54. Kumari M. V. R., 1998, Free Radical Res., 29, 93, 10.1080/10715769800300111 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Hanagata, N., Zhuang, F., Connolly, S., Li, J., Ogawa, N., & Xu, M.
Venue
ACS Nano
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2011-11-18
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
9326-9338
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
DOI
10.1021/nn202966t
OpenAlex
W2104086585
Cited by
175
References
4
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Responses of Human Lung Epithelial Cells to the Toxicity of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Inferred from Whole Genome Expression Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn202966t
The paper
Hanagata, N., Zhuang, F., Connolly, S., Li, J., Ogawa, N., & Xu, M. (2011). Molecular Responses of Human Lung Epithelial Cells to the Toxicity of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Inferred from Whole Genome Expression Analysis. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn202966t

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.