The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrochemical Immunosensors for Detection of Cancer Protein Biomarkers
Open accessAbstract
Bioanalytical methods have experienced unprecedented growth in recent years, driven in large part by the need for faster, more sensitive, more portable ("point of care") systems to detect protein biomarkers for clinical diagnosis. Electrochemical detection strategies, used in conjunction with immunosensors, offer advantages because they are fast, simple, and low cost. Recent developments in electrochemical immunosensors have significantly improved the sensitivity needed to detect low concentrations of biomarkers present in early stages of cancer. Moreover, the coupling of electrochemical devices with nanomaterials, such as gold nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, magnetic particles, and quantum dots, offers multiplexing capability for simultaneous measurements of multiple cancer biomarkers. This review will discuss recent advances in the development of electrochemical immunosensors for the next generation of cancer diagnostics, with an emphasis on opportunities for further improvement in cancer diagnostics and treatment monitoring. Details will be given for strategies to increase sensitivity through multilabel amplification, coupled with high densities of capture molecules on sensor surfaces. Such sensors are capable of detecting a wide range of protein quantities, from nanogram to femtogram (depending on the protein biomarkers of interest), in a single sample.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework
(2001) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1067/mcp.2001.113989 · Cited by 6,762
Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges
Ferrari, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1566 · Cited by 4,558
Electrochemiluminescence (ECL)
Richter, M. M. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020373d · Cited by 2,588
Carbon‐Nanotube Based Electrochemical Biosensors: A Review
Wang, J. (2005) · Electroanalysis · doi:10.1002/elan.200403113 · Cited by 2,387
Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence and Its Biorelated Applications
Miao, W. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068083a · Cited by 2,129
Biomarkers in Cancer Staging, Prognosis and Treatment Selection
Ludwig, J. A., & Weinstein, J. N. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1739 · Cited by 1,666
Array-Based Electrical Detection of DNA with Nanoparticle Probes
Park, S.-J., Taton, T. A., & Mirkin, C. A. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067003 · Cited by 1,515
Electrochemical biosensors: Towards point-of-care cancer diagnostics
Wang, J. (2006) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2005.10.027 · Cited by 1,454
Martinez, A. W., Phillips, S. T., Carrilho, E., Thomas, S. W., Sindi, H., & Whitesides, G. M. (2008) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac800112r · Cited by 1,443
Three-dimensional microfluidic devices fabricated in layered paper and tape
Martinez, A. W., Phillips, S. T., & Whitesides, G. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0810903105 · Cited by 1,246
Cited by
Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., Balogh, L. P., Ballerini, L., Bestetti, A., Brendel, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040 · Cited by 1,350
Self-citationBiomaterials and emerging anticancer therapeutics: engineering the microenvironment
Gu, L., & Mooney, D. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2015.3 · Cited by 407
Three-dimensional macro-structures of two-dimensional nanomaterials
Shehzad, K., Xu, Y., Gao, C., & Duan, X. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00218h · Cited by 357
Organ-on-a-chip platforms: a convergence of advanced materials, cells, and microscale technologies
Ahadian, S., Civitarese, R., Bannerman, D., Mohammadi, M. H., Lu, R., Wang, E., Davenport‐Huyer, L., Lai, B., Zhang, B., Zhao, Y., et al. (2018) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201700506 · Cited by 315
Bioanalytical Chemistry of Cytokines–a Review
Stenken, J. A., & Poschenrieder, A. J. (2015) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.009 · Cited by 302
Universal mobile electrochemical detector designed for use in resource-limited applications
Nemiroski, A., Christodouleas, D. C., Hennek, J. W., Kumar, A. A., Maxwell, E. J., Fernández-Abedul, M. T., & Whitesides, G. M. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1405679111 · Cited by 285
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Sensors for Clinical Decisions
Haick, H., & Tang, N. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c00085 · Cited by 231
The application of nanoparticles in point-of-care testing (POCT) immunoassays
Hou, F., Sun, S., Abdullah, S. W., Tang, Y., Li, X., & Guo, H. (2023) · Analytical Methods · doi:10.1039/d3ay00182b · Cited by 61
APOE expression and secretion are modulated by mitochondrial dysfunction
Wynne, M. E., Ogunbona, O., Lane, A. R., Gokhale, A., Zlatic, S. A., Xu, C., Wen, Z., Duong, D. M., Rayaprolu, S., Ivanova, A., et al. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.85779 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Chikkaveeraiah, B. V., Bhirde, A. A., Morgan, N. Y., Eden, H. S., & Chen, X.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-08-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 6546-6561
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W1983333664
- Cited by
- 719
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 17.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
