The DOI matches its Crossref record.
3D Optical Printing of Piezoelectric Nanoparticle–Polymer Composite Materials
Abstract
Here we demonstrate that efficient piezoelectric nanoparticle-polymer composite materials can be optically printed into three-dimensional (3D) microstructures using digital projection printing. Piezoelectric polymers were fabricated by incorporating barium titanate (BaTiO3, BTO) nanoparticles into photoliable polymer solutions such as polyethylene glycol diacrylate and exposing to digital optical masks that could be dynamically altered to generate user-defined 3D microstructures. To enhance the mechanical-to-electrical conversion efficiency of the composites, the BTO nanoparticles were chemically modified with acrylate surface groups, which formed direct covalent linkages with the polymer matrix under light exposure. The composites with a 10% mass loading of the chemically modified BTO nanoparticles showed piezoelectric coefficients (d(33)) of ∼ 40 pC/N, which were over 10 times larger than composites synthesized with unmodified BTO nanoparticles and over 2 times larger than composites containing unmodified BTO nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes to boost mechanical stress transfer efficiencies. These results not only provide a tool for fabricating 3D piezoelectric polymers but lay the groundwork for creating highly efficient piezoelectric polymer materials via nanointerfacial tuning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective
Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., & Hui, D. (2017) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 · Cited by 3,325
3D printing of smart materials: A review on recent progresses in 4D printing
Khoo, Z. X., Teoh, J. E. M., Liu, Y., Chua, C. K., Yang, S., An, J., Leong, K. F., & Yeong, W. Y. (2015) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2015.1097054 · Cited by 912
Deterministically patterned biomimetic human iPSC-derived hepatic model via rapid 3D bioprinting
Ma, X., Qu, X., Zhu, W., Li, Y.-S., Yuan, S., Zhang, H., Liu, J., Wang, P., Lai, C. S. E., Zanella, F., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1524510113 · Cited by 872
Self-citationRecent Progress in Additive Manufacturing of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite
Goh, G. D., Yap, Y. L., Agarwala, S., & Yeong, W. Y. (2019) · Advanced Materials Technologies · doi:10.1002/admt.201800271 · Cited by 621
Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects
Balla, V. K., Kate, K. H., Satyavolu, J., Singh, P., & Tadimeti, J. G. D. (2019) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 · Cited by 580
Yang, Y., Song, X., Li, X., Chen, Z., Zhou, C., Zhou, Q., & Chen, Y. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201706539 · Cited by 538
Piezoelectric materials as stimulatory biomedical materials and scaffolds for bone repair
Tandon, B., Blaker, J. J., & Cartmell, S. H. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.026 · Cited by 420
Additive Manufacturing of Piezoelectric Materials
Chen, C., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Yang, D., Yao, F., Zhang, W., Wang, B., Sewvandi, G. A., Yang, D., & Hu, D. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202005141 · Cited by 371
Digital Light Processing Based Three-dimensional Printing for Medical Applications
Zhang, J., Hu, Q., Wang, S., Tao, J., & Gou, M. (2019) · International Journal of Bioprinting · doi:10.18063/ijb.v6i1.242 · Cited by 359
Zhu, Z., Ng, D. W. H., Park, H. S., & McAlpine, M. C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-020-00235-2 · Cited by 348
Recent developments in 3D printable composite materials
Kalsoom, U., Nesterenko, P. N., & Paull, B. (2016) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c6ra11334f · Cited by 294
Nanoparticle–hydrogel superstructures for biomedical applications
Jiang, Y., Krishnan, N., Heo, J., Fang, R. H., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.05.041 · Cited by 266
Nanomaterial Patterning in 3D Printing
Elder, B., Neupane, R., Tokita, E., Ghosh, U., Hales, S., & Kong, Y. L. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201907142 · Cited by 265
Designed Assembly and Integration of Colloidal Nanocrystals for Device Applications
Yang, J., Choi, M. K., Kim, D., & Hyeon, T. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201502851 · Cited by 256
A review on 3D printed matrix polymer composites: its potential and future challenges
Saroia, J., Wang, Y., Wei, Q., Lei, M., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Zhang, K. (2020) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-019-04534-z · Cited by 253
Yang, T., Kim, J. R., Jin, H., Gil, H., Koo, J., & Kim, H. J. (2021) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202008831 · Cited by 178
Caldona, E. B., Dizon, J. R. C., Viers, R. A., Garcia, V. J., Smith, Z. J., & Advincula, R. C. (2021) · MRS Communications · doi:10.1557/s43579-021-00134-9 · Cited by 48
Sensing gastrointestinal motility
Haghiashtiani, G., & McAlpine, M. C. (2017) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-017-0146-1 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, K., Zhu, W., Qu, X., Aaronson, C., McCall, W. R., Chen, S., & Sirbuly, D. J.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-07-29
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 9799-9806
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2030818224
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
