Cited by 912Advanced Materials and MechanicsAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesSoft Robotics and Applications

3D printing of smart materials: A review on recent progresses in 4D printing

Khoo, Zhong Xun, Teoh, Joanne Ee Mei, Liu, Yong, Chua, Chee Kai, Yang, Shoufeng, An, Jia, Leong, Kah Fai, Yeong, Wai Yee·2015·Virtual and Physical Prototyping

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM), commonly known as three-dimensional (3D) printing or rapid prototyping, has been introduced since the late 1980s. Although a considerable amount of progress has been made in this field, there is still a lot of research work to be done in order to overcome the various challenges remained. Recently, one of the actively researched areas lies in the additive manufacturing of smart materials and structures. Smart materials are those materials that have the ability to change their shape or properties under the influence of external stimuli. With the introduction of smart materials, the AM-fabricated components are able to alter their shape or properties over time (the 4th dimension) as a response to the applied external stimuli. Hence, this gives rise to a new term called ‘4D printing’ to include the structural reconfiguration over time. In this paper, recent major progresses in 4D printing are reviewed, including 3D printing of enhanced smart nanocomposites, shape memory alloys, shape memory polymers, actuators for soft robotics, self-evolving structures, anti-counterfeiting system, active origami and controlled sequential folding, and some results from our ongoing research. In addition, some research activities on 4D bio-printing are included, followed by discussions on the challenges, applications, research directions and future trends of 4D printing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17452759.2015.1097054

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khoo, Z. X., Teoh, J. E. M., Liu, Y., Chua, C. K., Yang, S., An, J., Leong, K. F., & Yeong, W. Y.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Liu, Yong
Venue
Virtual and Physical Prototyping
Published
2015-07-03
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
103-122
ISSN
  • 1745-2759 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2767
OpenAlex
W1826414460
Cited by
912
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
64.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Virtual and Physical Prototyping (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nanyang Technological University (Tier 1 Project)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
4D printing, smart materials, additive manufacturing, shape memory polymers, shape memory alloys, anti-counterfeiting, stimuli-responsive materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review