Cited by 359Redox biology and oxidative stressNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms

Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Selectivity, Physicochemical and Biological Consequences, Denitration, and Proteomics Methods for the Identification of Tyrosine-Nitrated Proteins

Abello, Nicolas, Kerstjens, Huib A. M., Postma, Dirkje S., Bischoff, Rainer·2009·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

Protein tyrosine nitration (PTN) is a post-translational modification occurring under the action of a nitrating agent. Tyrosine is modified in the 3-position of the phenolic ring through the addition of a nitro group (NO2). In the present article, we review the main nitration reactions and elucidate why nitration is not a random chemical process. The particular physical and chemical properties of 3-nitrotyrosine (e.g., pKa, spectrophotometric properties, reduction to aminotyrosine) will be discussed, and the biological consequences of PTN (e.g., modification of enzymatic activity, sensitivity to proteolytic degradation, impact on protein phosphorylation, immunogenicity and implication in disease) will be reviewed. Recent data indicate the possibility of an in vivo denitration process, which will be discussed with respect to the different reaction mechanisms that have been proposed. The second part of this review article focuses on analytical methods to determine this post-translational modification in complex proteomes, which remains a major challenge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr900039c

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On low-resolution instruments, isobaric ions from non-modified peptides can yield false-positive results, so data evaluation should be treated with caution.

    “Especially on low resolution instruments, data evaluation should be treated with caution since isobaric ions from non-modified peptides can yield false-positive results [100].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abello, N., Kerstjens, H. A. M., Postma, D. S., & Bischoff, R.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Bischoff, Rainer
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
3222-3238
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W2126785007
Cited by
359
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 35
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Keywords
tyrosine nitration, nitrotyrosine, post-translational modification, nitrating agents, nitration selectivity, protein phosphorylation, protein immunogenicity, proteolysis, denitration
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Mitochondria, Models, Chemical, Nitrogen, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Proteins, Spectrophotometry, Mass Spectrometry, Subcellular Fractions, Tetranitromethane, Tyrosine, Phenol, Peroxynitrous Acid, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review