Cited by 50Gender Studies in LanguageGender and Feminist StudiesMedia, Gender, and Advertising

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Attitudes Toward Sexist/Nonsexist Language

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1007002422225

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Acosta, R. V., & Carpenter, L. J. (1996). Women in intercollegiate sport: A longitudinal study—Nineteen year update, 1977–1996. Unpublished manuscript, Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, New York.
  2. American Psychological Association. (1983). Publication manual (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  3. Kidd, V. (1971). A study of the images produced through the use of the male pronoun as the generic. Moments in Contemporary Rhetoric and Communication, 1, 25–30.
  4. Krane, V., & Kane, M. J. (1998). Psychosocial aspects of sport and exercise. In J. B. Parks, B. R. K. Zanger, & J. Quarterman (Eds.), Contemporary sport management (pp. 33–47). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  5. Nilsen, A. P. (1977). Sexism in children's books and elementary teaching materials. In A. P. Nilsen, H. A. Bosmajian, H. L. Gershuny, & J. P. Stanley (Eds.), Sexism and language, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
  6. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  7. Parks, J. B. (Executive Producer), Harper, M. C. (Script Writer), & Lopez, P. G. (Director). (1994). One person's struggle with gender-biased language [Videotape]. Bowling Green, OH: WBGU-TV.
  8. Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. (1973). Sex role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist, 8, 12–18.
  9. Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., & Henley, N. (1983). Language, gender, and society: Opening a second decade of research (pp. 7–24). In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, and N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society, Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  10. Woog, D. (1998). Jocks: True stories of America's gay male athletes. LosAngeles: Alyson Books.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A.
Affiliations
Bowling Green State University (US)
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
2000-03
Volume
42
Issue
5-6
Pages
415-438
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W1548886112
Cited by
43
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
  • University of Missouri
  • University of South Florida
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
sexist language, inclusive language, language attitudes, scale development, content validity, construct validity, reliability statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review