Cited by 116Psychological Treatments and AssessmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unconditional self-acceptance and responses to negative feedback

Chamberlain, John M., Haaga, David A. F.·2001·Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Rational-emotive behavior therapy (REBT; Ellis, 1995) contends that esteeming oneself-favorably or unfavorably-is illogical (implying an objective basis for evaluating global worth) and counterproductive (making one prone to depression in the wake of setbacks, anxiety otherwise). A healthier outlook requires unconditional self-acceptance (USA). We evaluated predictions regarding USA in a nonclinical university student sample. Consistent with REBT, participants scoring high on a USA questionnaire, controlling for self-esteem level, reported being low in proneness to depression and in self-esteem lability. They also were more objective in evaluating their performance on a public speaking task and were less apt to denigrate people who provided negative evaluations of their speeches. Predictions regarding impression management, willingness to try another speech, and mood or state self-esteem reactivity to feedback were not supported. Discussion focused on implications for research on USA as well as applied implications for therapy or prevention programs. © 2001 Human Sciences Press, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1011141500670

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 116

Metadata

Authors
Chamberlain, J. M., & Haaga, D. A. F.
Affiliations
American University (US)
Corresponding author
Haaga, David A. F.
Venue
Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Published
2001-09
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
177-189
ISSN
  • 0894-9085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6563
OpenAlex
W1804494138
Cited by
116
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
unconditional self-acceptance, negative feedback, rational emotive behavior therapy, self-esteem, depression proneness, impression management, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review