Cited by 688Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCultural Competency in Health CareChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cultural Sensitivity and Adaptation in Family-Based Prevention Interventions

Abstract

Because of the substantial impact of families on the developmental trajectories of children, family interventions should be a critical ingredient in comprehensive prevention programs. Very few family interventions have been adapted to be culturally sensitive for different ethnic groups. This paper examines the research literature on whether culturally adapting family interventions improves retention and outcome effectiveness. Because of limited research on the topic, the prevention research field is divided on the issue. Factors to consider for cultural adaptations of family-focused prevention are presented. Five research studies testing the effectiveness of the generic version of the Strengthening Families Program (SFP) compared to culturally-adapted versions for African Americans, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian families suggest that cultural adaptations made by practitioners that reduce dosage or eliminate critical core content can increase retention by up to 40%, but reduce positive outcomes. Recommendations include the need for additional research on culturally-sensitive family interventions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1019902902119

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies suggest that certain types of adaptation decrease the benefits associated with the intervention.

    “Some research suggests that adaptation is likely necessary to promote sustainability (7, 8, 23), although other studies suggest that certain types of adaptation decrease the benefits associated with the intervention (68, 128).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Boyd-Franklin, N. (1989). Block families in therapy:Amulti-systems approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  2. Boyd-Franklin, N. (2001). Reaching out to larger systems. In interventions with multi-cultural families (Part 2). The Family Psychologist, 17(3), 1–4.
  3. Coie, J., Watt, N., Hawkins, S., Ramey, S., Markman, H., Long, B., & West, S. (1991, June). Prevention research: Conceptual model of strategies and procedures. Paper presented at the National Prevention Conference sponsored by NIMH, Washington, DC.
  4. Kameoka, V. A. (1996). The effects of a family-focused intervention on reducing risk for substance abuse among Asian and Pacific-Island youths and families: Evaluation of the Strengthening Hawaii's Families Project. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Social Welfare Evaluation and Research Unit.
  5. Kumpfer, K. L., & Alvarado, R. (1995). Strengthening families to prevent drug use in multi-ethnic youth. In G. Botvin, S. Schinke, & M. Orlandi (Eds.), Drug abuse prevention with multi-ethnic youth (pp. 253–292). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  6. Kumpfer, K. L., & DeMarsh, J. P. (1985). Prevention of chemical dependency in children of alcohol and drug abusers. NIDA Notes, 5, 2–3.
  7. Kumpfer, K. L., DeMarsh, J. P., & Child, W. (1989). Strengthening Families Program: Children's Skill Training Curriculum Manual (prevention services to children of substance-abusing parents). Salt Lake City: Department of Health, Alcohol and Drug Research Center.
  8. Kumpfer, K. L., Molgaard, V., & Spoth, R. (1996). The Strengthening Families Program for prevention of delinquency and drug use in special populations. In R. De V Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency: Prevention and early intervention approaches. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  9. Kumpfer, K. L., Wamberg, K., & Martinez, D. (1996). Strengthening Hispanic Families Program. Paper presented at the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, High Risk Youth Conference, Washington, DC.
  10. Kumpfer, K. L., & Whiteside, H. O. (2000). Strengthening Families Program. Department of Health Promotion and Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
  11. Mock, M. (2001). Working with Asian American families. In interventions with multi-cultural families (Part 2). The Family Psychologist, 17(3), 5–7.
  12. Turner, C., Sales, L., & Sambrano, S. (1998). Predictors of substance abuse in the High Risk Youth grantee study. Presentation at CSAP High Risk Youth Grantee Conference.
  13. Whitbeck, L., & Smith, J. (2001). Outcomes of a culturally-modified family program for Ojibway Indian families.Washington, DC: Society for Prevention Research.
  14. Wong, L., & Mock, M. (1997). Developmental and life cycle issues of Asian Americans: Asian American young adults. In E. Lee (Ed.), Working with Asian Americans: A guide for Clinicians (pp. 196–207). New York: Guilford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R., Smith, P., & Bellamy, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Kumpfer, Karol L.
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2002-09
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
241-246
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W1698168944
Cited by
688
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 38
FWCI
36.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da010825-05)
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA10825)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
cultural adaptation, Strengthening Families Program, cultural sensitivity, intervention retention, intervention effectiveness, ethnic minority families, African American families, Latino families, Native American families, dose reduction
MeSH terms
Culture, Ethnicity, Family Therapy, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Parents, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review