Cited by 388Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Vision and ImagingAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Variational Methods for Multimodal Image Matching

Hermosillo, Gerardo, Chefd'Hotel, Christophe, Faugeras, Olivier·2002·International Journal of Computer Vision

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020830525823

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Common approaches to multi-modal registration use image synthesis or complex hand-crafted or learned similarity measures.

    “General approaches address multimodal image registration by either performing image synthesis [22, 23] to change the problem to a uni-modal image registration task, or by proposing complex, hand-crafted [24, 25, 26, 27] or learned [28, 29, 30, 31, 32] multi-modal image similarity measures.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Christensen, G., Miller, M., and Vannier, M. 1994. A 3d deformable magnetic resonance textbook based on elasticity. In Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Symposium: Applications of Computer Vision in Medical Image Processing.
  2. Hata, N., Dohi, T., Warfield, S.,, Kikinis, R., and Jolesz, F.A. 1998. Multi-modality deformable regristration of pre-and intra-operative images for mri-guided brain surgery. In First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. G. Goos and J. Hartmanis (Eds.), vol. 1496 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer: Berlin.
  3. Toga, A., (Ed.). 1998. Brain Warping. Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hermosillo, G., Chefd'Hotel, C., & Faugeras, O.
Affiliations
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Published
2002-12
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
329-343
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
OpenAlex
W1518961746
Cited by
388
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 30
FWCI
19.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Institut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique (INRIA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
multimodal image registration, non-rigid registration, variational methods, statistical similarity measures, optical flow, well-posedness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review