Cited by 493Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and AnalyticsAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling

Conati, Cristina, Gertner, Abigail, VanLehn, Kurt·2002·User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021258506583

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Breese, J., Goldman, R. and Wellman, P.: 1994, Introduction to the special section on knowledge-based construction of probabilistic and decision models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24, pp. 1577-1579.
  2. Huber, M. J., Durfee, E. H. and Wellman, M. P.: 1994, The automated mapping of plans for plan recognition. Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 344-351.
  3. Martin, J. and VanLehn, K.: 1993, OLAE: Progress toward a multi-activity, Bayesian student modeller. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1993: Proceedings of AI-ED 93, Charlottesville, VA, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 410-417.
  4. Petrushin, V. A., Sinitsa, K.M. and Zherdienko, V.: 1995, Probabilistic approach to adaptive student knowledge assessment: methodology and experiment. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Proceedings of AI-ED ‘95, Washington, DC, U.S.A., pp. 51-58.
  5. Shelby, R. N., Schulze, K. G., Treacy, D. J., Wintersgill, M. C. and VanLehn, K.: 2001, The Andes Intelligent Tutor: an Evaluation. Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Rochester, NY.
  6. Van Mulken, S.: 1996, Reasoning about the user’s decoding of presentations in an intelligent multimedia presentation system. Proceedings of UM ‘96, 5th International Conference on User Modeling, Kailua Kona, HW, U.S.A., pp. 67-74.
  7. VanLehn, K. and Niu, Z. 2001, Bayesian student modeling, useri nterfaces and feedback: A sensitivity analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 154-184.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Conati, C., Gertner, A., & VanLehn, K.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Mitre (United States) (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
  • Conati, Cristina
  • Gertner, Abigail
  • VanLehn, Kurt
Venue
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Published
2002-11
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
371-417
ISSN
  • 0924-1868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1391
OpenAlex
W1529098247
Cited by
493
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 27
FWCI
18.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
Bayesian networks, student modeling, uncertainty management, adaptive tutoring systems, knowledge assessment, plan recognition, model scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review