CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 131Social and Intergroup PsychologyLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antecedents and Potential Moderators of the Relationship Between Attitudes and Hiring Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation

Horvath, Michael, Ryan, Ann Marie·2003·Sex Roles
DOI 10.1023/a:1022499121222
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1022499121222

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hiring is not a value-free and neutral process; hiring discrimination has been well documented based on gender, sexual orientation, weight, ethnic and racial identity, disability, mental health, and so forth.

    “Hiring is not a value-free and neutral process whereby the 'best' applicant is offered the job; hiring discrimination has been well documented based on gender (Petit 2007), sexual orientation (Horvath and Ryan 2003), weight (Agerström and Rooth 2011), ethnic and racial identity (Derous et al. 2009), disability (Gouvier et al. 2003), mental health (Krupa et al. 2009), and so forth.”

    From Cybervetting job applicants on social media: the new normal? (2020) · cites this paper as Horvath and Ryan 2003

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Badgett, M. V. L. (2001). Money, myths, and change: The economic lives of lesbians and gay men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York: Guilford, Press.
  3. Hugick, L. (1992, June). Public opinion divided on gay rights. Gallup Poll Monthly, 321, 2–6.
  4. Jackson, J. S. (1991). Methodological approach. In J. S. Jackson (Ed.), Life in Black America (pp. 13–30). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  5. Segal, J. A. (1995, February). The unprotected minority? HR Magazine, 40, 27–33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Horvath, M., & Ryan, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Horvath, Michael
ORCID
Venue
Sex Roles
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-02
Volume
48
Issue
3-4
Pages
115-130
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
DOI
10.1023/a:1022499121222
OpenAlex
W246764644
Cited by
131
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Funders
Michigan State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
hiring discrimination, sexual orientation, attitudes toward lesbians and gay men, resume evaluation, religiosity, traditional gender roles, gender stereotypes, moderators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review