Cited by 13Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Threat Vigilance in Child Witnesses of Domestic Violence: A Pilot Study Utilizing the Ambiguous Situations Paradigm

Open access
Coyne, Joseph J., Barrett, Paula M., Duffy, Amanda L.·2000·Journal of Child and Family Studies

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026400725090

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the internalizing and externalizing effect size estimates of one study (Coyne, Barrett, & Duffy, 2000) needed to be Windsorized.

    “this criterion, both the internalizing and externalizing effect size estimates of one study (i.e., Coyne, Barrett, & Duffy, 2000) needed to be Windsorized.”

    From Exposure to domestic violence: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent outcomes (2008) · cites this paper as Coyne, Barrett, & Duffy, 2000

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Achenbach, T.M. & Edelbrock, C.S. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont.
  2. Dutton, D.G. (1992). Theoretical and empirical perspectives on the etiology and prevention of wife assault. In R. DeV. Peters, R.J. McMahon, & V.L. Quinsey (Eds.). Aggression and violence throughout the life span (pp. 192–221). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  3. Holland, D. & Dadds, M. (1995). Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Adolescents and Parents. Unpublished manuscript, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld.
  4. Hughes, H.M. (1992). Impact of spouse abuse on children of batteredwomen: Implications for practice. Violence Update, 2(12), 1–11.
  5. James, M. (1994). Domestic violence as a form of child abuse: Identification and prevention. Issues in Child Abuse Prevention (No. 2, pp. 28–42).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Coyne, J. J., Barrett, P. M., & Duffy, A. L.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Barrett, Paula M.
Venue
Journal of Child and Family Studies
Published
2000-09
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
377-388
ISSN
  • 1062-1024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2843
OpenAlex
W1502413850
Cited by
11
References
13
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Family Studies (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
threat vigilance, children exposed to domestic violence, family violence exposure, threat perception, marital conflict, child adjustment, cognitive factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review