The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B., & Schon, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,268
Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0612 · Cited by 5,464
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · Cited by 5,186
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Schon, D. A., & DeSanctis, V. (1986) · The Journal of Continuing Higher Education · doi:10.1080/07377366.1986.10401080 · Cited by 3,224
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410609519 · Cited by 2,732
Cited by
So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009 · Cited by 1,221
Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review
De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005 · Cited by 940
Content analysis: What are they talking about?
Strijbos, J.-W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002 · Cited by 538
Cooperation and the Use of Technology
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781410609519-41 · Cited by 518
Validity in quantitative content analysis
Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504769 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C.
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-152
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W1524182010
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 126.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1003764722829
- The paper
- Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1003764722829
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
