Cited by 189Cancer survivorship and careHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: A comparison with SF-36 Health Survey in a cohort of Italian long-survival cancer patients

Open access
Apolone, G., Filiberti, A., Cifani, S., Ruggiata, R., Mosconi, P.·1998·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background Despite the large amount of data available about the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, there have been very few studies focussed on long-survival cancer patients, and no data are available on its performance in the Italian setting.Patients and methods Within the framework of a project aimed at evaluating the characteristics of available HR-QOL questionnaires in the Italian language, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire together with the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) were mail-administered to a sample of patients previously recruited in two large multicenter randomized clinical trials on early breast and colon cancers. The properties of the questionnaire were evaluated using standard psychometric techniques and correlation analyses with demographic and clinical independent variables.Results In the sample of patients who sent back the questionnaires under evaluation, the EORTC QLQ-C30 showed satisfactory acceptability (response rate = 64% and very low prevalence of missing at item and scale level), and the psychometric analyses confirmed the multi-dimensional conceptualisation in terms of convergent and discriminant validity. Moreover, EORTC QLQ-C30 scales showed substantial correlation with the homologous SF-36 scales. Few socio-demographic (age, gender, schooling) and clinical (type of cancer disease) variables were associated with HR-QOL. Breast cancer patients reported, on average, worse physical health-related scores, but after adjustment for age and education, most of the differences disappeared.Conclusions These findings confirm the validity and robustness of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in this sample of long-survival Italian cancer patients. Further ad hoc validation studies are required to evaluate its significance in these particular patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1008264412398

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Apolone, G., Filiberti, A., Cifani, S., Ruggiata, R., & Mosconi, P.
Affiliations
  • Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT)
  • European Institute of Oncology (IT)
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
549-557
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097703471
Cited by
189
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, health-related quality of life, questionnaire validation, breast cancer, colon cancer, psychometric properties, Italian language, questionnaire acceptability, physical function
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Survival Analysis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review