CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 321Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Smarter Sex: A Critical Review of Sex Differences in Intelligence

Halpern, Diane F., LaMay, Mary L.·2000·Educational Psychology Review
DOI 10.1023/a:1009027516424
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1009027516424

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Astin, A., Sax, L., Korn, W., and Mahoney, K. (1995). The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 1995. Higher Education Research Institute, Los Angeles.
  2. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. Basic, New York.
  3. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. Bantam, New York.
  4. Henning-Stout, M., and Close-Conoley, J. (1992). Gender: A subtle influence in the culture of the school. In Medway, F. J. and Cafferty, T. P. (Eds.), School Psychology: A Social Psychological Perspective (pp. 113-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  5. Hunt, M. (1999). The New Know-Nothings. Transaction, New Brunswick.
  6. Makintosh, N. J. (1996). Sex differences in IQ. J. Biosoc. Sci. 28: 559-571.
  7. Paganini-Hill, A., Buckwalter, J. G., Logan, C. G., and Henderson, V. W. (1993). Estrogen replacement and Alzheimer's disease in women. Soc. Neurosci. Abst. 19: 1046.
  8. Smolak, L. (1986). Infancy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  9. Stanley, J. C., Benbow, C. P., Brody, L. E., Dauber, S., and Lupkowski, A. (1992). Gender differences in eighty-six nationally standardized aptitude and achievement tests. In Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., and Ambroson, D. L. (Eds.), Talent Development, Vol. 1: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Trillium Press, Unionville, NY, pp. 42-65.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–320 of 320

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Halpern, D. F., & LaMay, M. L.
Affiliations
  • California State University, San Bernardino (US)
  • Loma Linda University (US)
ORCID
Halpern, Diane F.
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2000-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
229-246
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
DOI
10.1023/a:1009027516424
OpenAlex
W1543887101
Cited by
321
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 22
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
sex differences in intelligence, general intelligence, cognitive ability, working memory, visual imagery, verbal ability, mathematics achievement, intellectual disability, nature versus nurture, cross-cultural comparison, lifespan development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review