Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drug Abuse Prevention Among Minority Adolescents: Posttest and One-Year Follow-Up of a School-Based Preventive Intervention

Botvin, Gilbert J., Griffin, Kenneth W., Diaz, Tracy, Ifill-Williams, Michelle·2001·Prevention Science
DOI 10.1023/a:1010025311161
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1010025311161

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1988). The effects of school-based substance abuse education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Drug Education, 18, 243–264. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Barnes, G. M., & Welte, J. W. (1986). Adolescent alcohol abuse: Subgroup differences and relationships to other problem behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1,79–94. · DOI
  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal ofPersonality & Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Botvin, G. J. (1986). Substance abuse prevention research: Recent developments and future directions. Journal of School Health, 56, 369–374. · DOI
  6. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L. D., Botvin, E. M., & Diaz, T. (1995a). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a White middle-class population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1106–1112. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Tortu, S., & Botvin, E. M. (1990). Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive–behavioral approach: Results of a three-year study. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 58, 437–446. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Botvin, G. J., Batson, H., Witts-Vitale, S., Bess, V., Baker, E., & Dusenbury, L. (1989a). A psychosocial approach to smoking prevention for urban black youth. Public Health Reports, 104, 573–582.
  9. Botvin, G. J., & Botvin, E. M. (1997). School-based programs. In J. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook (3rd Ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
  10. Botvin, E. M., Botvin, G. J., Renick, N. L., Filazzola, A. D., & Allegrante, J. P. (1984). Adolescents self-reports of tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use: Examining the comparability of video tape, cartoon, and verbal bogus pipeline procedures. Psychological Reports, 55, 379–386. · DOI
  11. Botvin, G. J., Dusenbury, L., Baker, E., James-Ortiz, S., Botvin, E. M., & Kerner, J. (1992). Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: Assessing effects on outcome and mediating variables. Health Psychology, 11, 290–299. · DOI
  12. Botvin, G. J., Dusenbury, L., Baker, E., James-Ortiz, S., & Kerner, J. (1989b). A skills training approach to smoking prevention among Hispanic youth. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12, 279–296. · DOI
  13. Botvin, G. J., Epstein, J. A., Baker, E., Diaz, T., Ifill-Williams, M., Miller, N., & Cardwell, J. (1997). School-based drug abuse prevention with inner-city minority youth. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 6, 5–19. · DOI
  14. Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., Diaz, T., Scheier, L. M., Williams, C., & Epstein, J. A. (2000). Preventing illicit drug use in adolescents: Long-term follow-up data from a randomized control trial of a school population. Addictive Behaviors, 5, 769–774. · DOI
  15. Botvin, G. J., Renick, N. L., & Baker, E. (1983). The effects of scheduling format and booster sessions on a broad-spectrum psychosocial smoking prevention program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 6, 359–379. · DOI
  16. Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S. P., Epstein, J. A., & Diaz, T., (1994). Effectiveness of culturally-focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority youths. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 8, 116–127. · DOI
  17. Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S. P., Epstein, J. A., Diaz, T., & Botvin, E. M. (1995b). Effectiveness of culturally-focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Two-year follow-up results. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9, 183–194. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Bruvold, W. H, & Rundall, T. G. (1988). A meta-analysis and theoretical review of school based tobacco and alcohol intervention programs. Psychology and Health, 2, 53–78. · DOI
  19. Ellickson, P., & Bell, R. M. (1990). Drug prevention in junior high: A multi-site longitudinal test. Science, 247, 1299–1305. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Evans, R. I., Hansen, W. B., & Mittlemark, M. B. (1977). Increasing the validity of self-reports of smoking behavior in children. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 521–523. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  22. Flay, B. R. (1985). What we know about the social influences approach to smoking prevention: Review and recommendations. InC. S. Bell & R. Battjes (Eds.), Prevention research: Deterring drug abuse among children (NIDAResearch Monograph #63). Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
  23. Gambrill, E.D., & Richey, C.A. (1975). An assertion inventory for use in assessment and research. Behavior Therapy, 6, 550–561. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Goodstadt, M. S. (1986). Drug education: The prevention issues. Journal of Drug Education, 19, 197–208. · DOI
  25. Groemping, U. (1994). GEE: A SAS macro for longitudinal data analysis. Dortmund: University of Dortmund, Department of Statistics.
  26. Hansen, W. B. (1992). School-based substance prevention: A review of the state-of-the-art in curriculum. Health Education Research, 7, 403–430. · DOI
  27. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.
  28. Johnston, L.D., O Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J.G. (1998). National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–1997,Vol.I: Secondary school students (NIH Pub. No. 98-4345). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  29. McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 192–227). New York: Academic Press.
  30. Murray, D. M., Hannan, P. J. (1990). Planning for the appropriate analysis in school-based drug-use prevention studies. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 58, 45–468. · DOI
  31. Norton, E. C., Bieler, G. S., Ennett, S. T., & Zarkin, G. A. (1996). Analysis of prevention program effectiveness with clustered data using generalized estimating equations. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 64, 919–926. · DOI
  32. Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1990). Adolescent drug use: Findings of national and local surveys. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 58, 385–394. · DOI
  33. Pandina, R. J. (1997). Risk and protective factor models in adolescent drug use: Putting them to work for prevention. In National conference on drug abuse prevention research: presentations, papers, and recommendations,U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  34. Pentz, M. A., Dwyer, J. H., MacKinnon, D. P., Flay, B. R., Hansen, W.B., Wang, E.Y., & Johnson, C. A. (1989).Amulticommunity trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse. Effects on drug prevalence. Journal of American Medical Association, 261, 3259–3266. · DOI · Paper page
  35. SAS Institute (1996). SAS/STAT User s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Publications.
  36. Tobler, N. S. (1986). Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: Quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. Journal of Drug Issues, 16, 537–567. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Tobler, N. S., & Stratton, H. H. (1997). Effectiveness of schoolbased drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 71–128. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Tortu, S., & Botvin, G. J. (1989). School-based smoking prevention: The teacher training process. Preventive Medicine, 18, 280–289. · DOI
  39. Trimble, J. E. (1995). Toward an understanding of ethnicity and ethnic identity, and their relationship with drug use research. InG. J. Botvin, S. Schinke, & M. A. Orlandi (Eds.), Drug abuse prevention with multiethnic youth (pp. 3–27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., Diaz, T., & Ifill-Williams, M.
Venue
Prevention Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2001-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
DOI
10.1023/a:1010025311161
OpenAlex
W1492926366
Cited by
334
References
1
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.